• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单肋间胸腔镜入路用于微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术

A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

作者信息

Pan Saibo, Wang Lian, Wu Ming, Wang Qi, Shen Gang, Chen Gang

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, China .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1198-1202. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0147. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2017.0147
PMID:28504587
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We present a laparoscopic and single intercostal space thoracoscopic approach (SICS group) for Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and provide postoperative analgesia with a continuous multiple intercostal nerve blocking technique. The characters of this technique are evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2015 to April 2016, 18 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer were treated with Ivor Lewis MIE by a SICS group. Moreover, from July 2014 to September 2015, 48 patients with esophageal cancer received Ivor Lewis MIE by four-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach. Among those patients, by using propensity-score matching, 18 matched patients who underwent four-port VATS MIE (four-port group) were retrospectively selected for further statistical analysis. Patient demographics, short-term postoperative outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

None of the patients in the SICS group required conversion to an open procedure. No failure of the intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy occurred. No perioperative mortality or readmission was observed in this series. No patient suffered from anastomotic leak or complained remarkable dysphasia during follow-up. SICS group had a shorter duration of both docking procedure and closure of chest incisions compared with four-port group. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores on 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in SICS group than in four-port group, while the values on 6 hours were comparable. The level of creatine kinase on postoperative day (POD) 1 was significantly lower in SICS group than in four-port group.

CONCLUSION

Single intercostal space thoracoscopic procedure is safe and technically feasible and can therefore be viewed as an attractive alternative approach for performing Ivor Lewis MIE.

摘要

目的

我们介绍一种用于艾弗·刘易斯微创食管切除术(MIE)的腹腔镜联合单肋间胸腔镜入路(SICS组),并采用连续多肋间神经阻滞技术进行术后镇痛。对该技术的特点进行评估。

材料与方法

2015年10月至2016年4月,18例连续的食管癌患者接受了SICS组的艾弗·刘易斯MIE治疗。此外,2014年7月至2015年9月,48例食管癌患者接受了四孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)入路的艾弗·刘易斯MIE治疗。在这些患者中,通过倾向评分匹配,回顾性选择了18例接受四孔VATS MIE的匹配患者(四孔组)进行进一步的统计分析。记录患者的人口统计学资料、术后短期结局。

结果

SICS组患者均无需转为开放手术。胸内食管胃吻合术无失败病例。本系列未观察到围手术期死亡或再次入院情况。随访期间无患者发生吻合口漏或出现明显吞咽困难。与四孔组相比,SICS组的对接手术和胸壁切口关闭时间均较短。SICS组术后24小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分显著低于四孔组,而6小时时的评分相当。SICS组术后第1天的肌酸激酶水平显著低于四孔组。

结论

单肋间胸腔镜手术安全且技术可行,因此可被视为进行艾弗·刘易斯MIE的一种有吸引力的替代方法。

相似文献

1
A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.单肋间胸腔镜入路用于微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1198-1202. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0147. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with single-utility incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of mid-lower esophageal cancer.完全微创的Ivor-Lewis食管切除术联合单功能切口电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗中下段食管癌。
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Feb-Mar;29(2):139-45. doi: 10.1111/dote.12306. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
3
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].[微创食管癌切除术中Ivor-Lewis术式与McKeown术式的短期疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91.
4
Anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy via two ports provides equivalent perioperative outcomes to open.通过双端口进行的微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的吻合术,其围手术期结果与开放手术相当。
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51 Suppl 2:e25-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.151996.
5
Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.远端食管癌和胃食管交界癌全微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术的技术及短期疗效:来自六个欧洲中心的汇总数据
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):119-126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4938-2. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: initial experience from China.腹腔镜联合胸腔镜 Ivor Lewis 食管癌切除术:来自中国的初步经验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Apr;125(8):1376-80.
7
A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术的初步经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Jul;25(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01269.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
8
Usage of "Reversal Penetrating Technique" with Ancillary Trocar in Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.辅助套管针“反转穿透技术”在微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术中的应用
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jan;27(1):67-70. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0323. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
9
Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program.一项新的微创食管切除术项目的早期经验与教训
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1692-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4343-2. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.微创食管切除术围手术期并发症的标准化比较:Ivor Lewis 与 McKeown 术式。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Thoracoscopic three-port single versus multiple intercostal for radical resection of esophageal cancer: a retrospective analysis.胸腔镜三孔单切口与多切口用于食管癌根治术的回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1104. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12754-0.