Russotto Vincenzo, Cortegiani Andrea, Raineri Santi Maurizio, Gregoretti Cesare, Giarratano Antonino
Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies (DIBIMED), Section of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via del vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Department of Biopathology and Medical Biotechnologies (DIBIMED), Section of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Via del vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 8.
To evaluate which respiratory support method for critically ill patients undergoing endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with less desaturation.
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and CINAHL databases. We included randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies investigating any method of respiratory support before/during ETI compared to a reference control.
Apneic oxygenation (ApOx) was the most commonly investigated respiratory support technique for critically ill patients undergoing intubation (4 RCTs, 358 patients). Three of these studies investigated high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ApOx while standard nasal cannula was used in one. Globally, ApOx was associated with higher minimum SpO value compared to those receiving ETI without ApOx (mean difference 2.31%, 95% CI 0.42 to 4.20, p=0.02, I=0%) but there were not significant differences between groups in severe hypoxemia and intubation related - complications. Concerning other techniques, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was compared to bag-valve mask in only one RCT and it reduced the degree of desaturation.
ApOx was significantly associated with higher minimum SpO registered during the intubation procedure. Further studies are needed to increase the number of included patients and demonstrate the benefit of ApOx and of other respiratory support methods (e.g. NIV, HFNC).
评估对于接受气管插管(ETI)的重症患者,哪种呼吸支持方法与更低的血氧饱和度下降相关。
我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和CINAHL数据库。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机对照试验(非RCT),这些研究调查了与参考对照相比,在ETI之前/期间的任何呼吸支持方法。
对于接受插管的重症患者,无氧通气(ApOx)是研究最广泛的呼吸支持技术(4项RCT,358例患者)。其中3项研究调查了用于ApOx的高流量鼻导管(HFNC),1项使用标准鼻导管。总体而言,与未接受ApOx的ETI患者相比,ApOx与更高的最低SpO值相关(平均差异2.31%,95%CI 0.42至4.20,p = 0.02,I² = 0%),但在严重低氧血症和插管相关并发症方面,组间无显著差异。关于其他技术,仅在1项RCT中将无创通气(NIV)与袋阀面罩进行了比较,它降低了血氧饱和度下降的程度。
ApOx与插管过程中记录到的更高最低SpO显著相关。需要进一步研究以增加纳入患者数量,并证明ApOx和其他呼吸支持方法(如NIV、HFNC)的益处。