动态软组织松动术与被动拉伸技术对提高板球运动员腘绳肌柔韧性的比较研究。

A comparative study of dynamic soft tissue mobilization vs. passive stretching technique to improve the flexibility of hamstrings in cricket players.

作者信息

Abbas Mohsin, Bashir Muhammad Salman, Noor Rabiya

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Sargodha, Mandi Bahauddin Campus, Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

University Institute of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):779-781.

PMID:28507370

Abstract

Different therapies are available for correcting the tightness of hamstring muscles. Objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization DSTM technique and Passive Stretching PS to improve the flexibility of tight hamstrings in cricket players. A total of 120 cricket players having tightness of hamstrings were enrolled and randomized into two groups A and B using lottery method. Group-A was treated with DSTM and group-B with PS to improve the flexibility of hamstrings. Active Knee Extension Angle AKEA test was used to measure the hamstring tightness as it is a gold standard test for this purpose. The mean value of AKEA, pre-treatment score deficient to 180 degrees for DSTM was 25.66 ± 6.90, and that of PS was 25.46 ± 6.89, while the post-treatment score was 10.81 ± 4.30, and 18.63 ± 7.06 respectively. Post-treatment score for DSTM was statistically lower than PS. (p-value < 0.05). So it was concluded that it is better to use DSTM for acquiring better results.

摘要

有多种疗法可用于纠正腘绳肌的紧绷状态。本研究的目的是比较动态软组织松动术（DSTM）和被动拉伸（PS）在提高板球运动员紧绷腘绳肌柔韧性方面的效果。共有120名腘绳肌紧绷的板球运动员被招募，并通过抽签法随机分为A组和B组。A组采用DSTM治疗，B组采用PS治疗以提高腘绳肌的柔韧性。主动膝关节伸展角度（AKEA）测试被用于测量腘绳肌的紧绷程度，因为它是用于此目的的金标准测试。对于DSTM，治疗前AKEA低于180度的平均得分是25.66±6.90，PS组是25.46±6.89，而治疗后得分分别是10.81±4.30和18.63±7.06。DSTM的治疗后得分在统计学上低于PS组（p值<0.05）。因此得出结论，使用DSTM能获得更好的效果。