Suppr超能文献

小鼠胚胎成纤维细胞中非病毒转染方法的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Non-viral Transfection Methods in Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells.

作者信息

Lee Migi, Chea Kathleen, Pyda Rajyalakshmi, Chua Melissa, Dominguez Isabel

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Biomol Tech. 2017 Jul;28(2):67-74. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2802-003. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

Abstract

Mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells are an important model for developmental biology, disease, and reprogramming studies. However, as with other primary cells, they are challenging to transfect. Although viral gene-delivery methods achieve high gene-delivery efficiency, challenges with cell mutagenesis and safety among others have led to the use and improvement of non-viral gene-delivery methods in MEF cells. Despite the importance of gene delivery in MEF cells, there is limited comparison of method/reagent efficacy. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of different gene-delivery methods and several reagents currently available in MEF cells by introducing a plasmid containing enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP). We analyze transfection efficiency by EGFP fluorescence. Our results suggest that two gene-delivery methods-electroporation and magnetofection in combination with a lipid reagent, are the most efficient transfection methods in MEF cells. This study provides a foundation for the selection of transfection methods or reagents when using MEF cells.

摘要

小鼠胚胎成纤维细胞(MEF)是发育生物学、疾病和重编程研究的重要模型。然而,与其他原代细胞一样,它们的转染具有挑战性。尽管病毒基因递送方法可实现较高的基因递送效率,但细胞诱变和安全性等挑战促使人们在MEF细胞中使用并改进非病毒基因递送方法。尽管基因递送在MEF细胞中很重要,但方法/试剂功效的比较有限。在本研究中,我们通过导入含有增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)的质粒,比较了MEF细胞中不同基因递送方法和几种现有试剂的有效性。我们通过EGFP荧光分析转染效率。我们的结果表明,两种基因递送方法——电穿孔法和与脂质试剂结合的磁转染法,是MEF细胞中最有效的转染方法。本研究为使用MEF细胞时选择转染方法或试剂提供了依据。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Non-viral Transfection Methods in Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast Cells.
J Biomol Tech. 2017 Jul;28(2):67-74. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2802-003. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
3
Transfection of CCE mouse embryonic stem cells with EGFP and BDNF genes by the electroporation method.
Rejuvenation Res. 2006 Spring;9(1):26-30. doi: 10.1089/rej.2006.9.26.
4
Enhanced nanomagnetic gene transfection of human prenatal cardiac progenitor cells and adult cardiomyocytes.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e69812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069812. Print 2013.
5
Delivery of episomal vectors into primary cells by means of commercial transfection reagents.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015 May 29;461(2):348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.037. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Efficient transfection of embryonic and adult stem cells.
Stem Cells. 2004;22(4):531-43. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-531.
9
Efficiency of gene transfection into donor cells for nuclear transfer of bovine embryos.
Mol Reprod Dev. 2005 Oct;72(2):191-200. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20297.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissolving microneedles for nucleic acid delivery: A systematic search, review, and data synthesis.
Acta Biomater. 2025 Jun 15;200:115-131. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Efficient mRNA Delivery In Vitro and In Vivo Using a Polycharged Biodegradable Nanomaterial.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Dec 19;25(24):13620. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413620.
3
Optical imaging and gene transfection potential of linear polyethylenimine-coated AgS near-infrared quantum dots.
Turk J Biol. 2024 Aug 21;48(5):338-347. doi: 10.55730/1300-0152.2709. eCollection 2024.
5
Electroactive nanoinjection platform for intracellular delivery and gene silencing.
J Nanobiotechnology. 2023 Aug 17;21(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02056-1.
6
Live cell single-molecule imaging to study DNA repair in human cells.
DNA Repair (Amst). 2023 Sep;129:103540. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103540. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Genetic code expansion in mammalian cells: A plasmid system comparison.
Bioorg Med Chem. 2020 Dec 15;28(24):115772. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115772. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
9
Gene-edited murine cell lines for propagation of chronic wasting disease prions.
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 1;9(1):11151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47629-z.
10
High-Throughput Platform for Efficient Chemical Transfection, Virus Packaging, and Transduction.
Micromachines (Basel). 2019 Jun 10;10(6):387. doi: 10.3390/mi10060387.

本文引用的文献

1
Nanomagnetic Gene Transfection for Non-Viral Gene Delivery in NIH 3T3 Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts.
Materials (Basel). 2013 Jan 18;6(1):255-264. doi: 10.3390/ma6010255.
2
Depletion of autophagy receptor p62/SQSTM1 enhances the efficiency of gene delivery in mammalian cells.
FEBS Lett. 2016 Aug;590(16):2671-80. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12262. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
4
Nanomagnetic activation as a way to control the efficacy of nucleic acid delivery.
Pharm Res. 2015 Jan;32(1):103-21. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1448-6. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Nonviral direct conversion of primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts to neuronal cells.
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2012 Jul 10;1(7):e32. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2012.25.
8
Mouse embryonic stem cells inhibit murine cytomegalovirus infection through a multi-step process.
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 2;6(3):e17492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017492.
9
Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy.
Nat Cell Biol. 2011 Mar;13(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/ncb2164. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
10
Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Aug;397(8):3173-8. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3821-6. Epub 2010 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验