Department of Urology, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Internal Medicine & Outpatients Management Office, Guang An Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 10;2(2):CD012336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012336.pub2.
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) represent one of the most common clinical complaints in men. Alpha-blockers are widely used as first-line therapy for men with LUTS secondary to BPO, but up to one third of men report no improvement in their LUTS after taking alpha-blockers. Anticholinergics used in addition to alpha-blockers may help improve symptoms but it is uncertain how effective they are. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of combination therapy with anticholinergics and alpha-blockers in men with LUTS related to BPO.
We performed a comprehensive search of medical literature, including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registries, with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. The date of the latest search was 7 August 2020.
We included randomized controlled trials. Inclusion criteria were men with LUTS secondary to BPO, ages 40 years or older, and a total International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or greater. We excluded trials of men with a known neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or central nervous system disease, and those examining medical therapy for men who were treated with surgery for BPO. We performed three comparisons: combination therapy versus placebo, combination therapy versus alpha-blockers monotherapy, and combination therapy versus anticholinergics monotherapy.
Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted data according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence.
We included 23 studies with 6285 randomized men across three comparisons. The mean age of participants ranged from 54.4 years to 73.9 years (overall mean age 65.7 years). Of the included studies, 12 were conducted with a single-center setting, while 11 used a multi-center setting. We only found short-term effect (12 weeks to 12 months) of combination therapy based on available evidence. Combination therapy versus placebo: based on five studies with 2369 randomized participants, combination therapy may result in little or no difference in urologic symptom scores (mean difference (MD) -2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.55 to 0.08; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on quality of life (QoL) (MD -0.97, 95% CI -2.11 to 0.16; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy likely increases adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47; moderate-certainty evidence); based on 252 adverse events per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 61 more adverse events (95% CI 10 more to 119 more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy. Combination therapy versus alpha-blockers alone: based on 22 studies with 4904 randomized participants, we are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on urologic symptom scores (MD -2.04, 95% CI -3.56 to -0.52; very low-certainty evidence) and QoL (MD -0.71, 95% CI -1.03 to -0.38; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy may result in little or no difference in adverse events rate (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.34; low-certainty evidence); based on 228 adverse events per 1000 participants in the alpha-blocker group, this corresponds to 23 more adverse events (95% CI 23 fewer to 78 more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy. Combination therapy compared to anticholinergics alone: based on three studies with 1218 randomized participants, we are very uncertain about the effect of combination therapy on urologic symptom scores (MD -3.71, 95% CI -9.41 to 1.98; very low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy may result in an improvement in QoL (MD -1.49, 95% CI -1.88 to -1.11; low-certainty evidence). Combination therapy likely results in little to no difference in adverse events (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.95; moderate-certainty evidence); based on 115 adverse events per 1000 participants in the anticholinergic alone group, this corresponds to 4 fewer adverse events (95% CI 7 fewer to 13 more) per 1000 participants treated with combination therapy.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of the review, combination therapy with anticholinergics and alpha-blockers are associated with little or uncertain effects on urologic symptom scores compared to placebo, alpha-blockers, or anticholinergics monotherapy. However, combination therapy may result in an improvement in quality of life compared to anticholinergics monotherapy, but an uncertain effect compared to placebo, or alpha-blockers. Combination therapy likely increases adverse events compared to placebo, but not compared to alpha-blockers or anticholinergics monotherapy. The findings of this review were limited by study limitations, inconsistency, and imprecision. We were unable to conduct any of the predefined subgroup analyses.
良性前列腺增生(BPO)引起的下尿路症状(LUTS)是男性最常见的临床主诉之一。α-受体阻滞剂被广泛用作治疗 BPO 相关 LUTS 的一线药物,但多达三分之一的男性在服用α-受体阻滞剂后 LUTS 没有改善。联合使用抗胆碱能药物可能有助于改善症状,但效果如何尚不确定。
评估联合抗胆碱能药物和α-受体阻滞剂治疗 BPO 相关 LUTS 男性的效果。
我们对医学文献进行了全面检索,包括 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase 和试验注册库,对发表语言和发表状态没有限制。最新检索日期为 2020 年 8 月 7 日。
我们纳入了随机对照试验。纳入标准为:LUTS 继发于 BPO,年龄 40 岁或以上,总国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)为 8 或更高。我们排除了已知因脊髓损伤、多发性硬化或中枢神经系统疾病而导致神经源性膀胱的男性,以及那些针对因 BPO 而行手术治疗的男性进行医学治疗的试验。我们进行了三项比较:联合治疗与安慰剂、联合治疗与 α-受体阻滞剂单药治疗、联合治疗与抗胆碱能药物单药治疗。
两名综述作者独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型进行统计分析,并根据 Cochrane 系统评价干预手册解释数据。我们使用 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行评级。
我们纳入了 23 项研究,涉及 6285 名随机男性,进行了三项比较。参与者的平均年龄范围为 54.4 岁至 73.9 岁(总体平均年龄为 65.7 岁)。纳入的研究中,有 12 项为单中心研究,11 项为多中心研究。我们仅根据现有证据发现联合治疗具有短期疗效(12 周至 12 个月)。联合治疗与安慰剂:基于五项涉及 2369 名随机参与者的研究,联合治疗可能对尿症状评分(平均差值(MD)-2.73,95%置信区间(CI)-5.55 至 0.08;低确定性证据)没有明显或没有差异。我们对联合治疗对生活质量(QoL)的影响非常不确定(MD-0.97,95%CI-2.11 至 0.16;极低确定性证据)。联合治疗可能会增加不良反应(RR 1.24,95%CI 1.04 至 1.47;中等确定性证据);基于安慰剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 252 例不良反应,这相当于每 1000 名接受联合治疗的参与者中有 61 例(95%CI 10 例至 119 例)更多的不良反应。联合治疗与 α-受体阻滞剂单药治疗:基于 22 项涉及 4904 名随机参与者的研究,我们对联合治疗对尿症状评分(MD-2.04,95%CI-3.56 至-0.52;极低确定性证据)和 QoL(MD-0.71,95%CI-1.03 至-0.38;极低确定性证据)的效果非常不确定。联合治疗可能不会导致不良反应发生率的差异(RR 1.10,95%CI 0.90 至 1.34;低确定性证据);基于 α-受体阻滞剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 228 例不良反应,这相当于每 1000 名接受联合治疗的参与者中有 23 例(95%CI 23 例更少至 78 例更多)不良反应。联合治疗与抗胆碱能药物单药治疗:基于三项涉及 1218 名随机参与者的研究,我们对联合治疗对尿症状评分(MD-3.71,95%CI-9.41 至 1.98;极低确定性证据)的效果非常不确定。联合治疗可能会改善 QoL(MD-1.49,95%CI-1.88 至-1.11;低确定性证据)。联合治疗可能不会导致不良反应的差异(RR 1.26,95%CI 0.81 至 1.95;中等确定性证据);基于抗胆碱能药物单药治疗组每 1000 名参与者中有 115 例不良反应,这相当于每 1000 名接受联合治疗的参与者中有 4 例(95%CI 7 例更少至 13 例更多)不良反应。
基于本综述的结果,与安慰剂、α-受体阻滞剂或抗胆碱能药物单药治疗相比,联合使用抗胆碱能药物和α-受体阻滞剂治疗 BPO 相关 LUTS 与尿症状评分的效果小或不确定。然而,与抗胆碱能药物单药治疗相比,联合治疗可能会改善生活质量,但与安慰剂或α-受体阻滞剂相比,效果不确定。与安慰剂相比,联合治疗可能会增加不良反应,但与 α-受体阻滞剂或抗胆碱能药物单药治疗相比则不会。本综述的研究结果受到研究局限性、不一致性和不精确性的限制。我们无法进行任何预设的亚组分析。