• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌性肿瘤型全髋关节翻修术中的应用:改变游戏规则者?

Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Oncologic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Game Changer?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3692-3696. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.038
PMID:32653350
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modular fluted tapered (MFT) stems are the most frequently used femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Despite this, no data are available on how they perform in revision THA for oncologic salvage. This is a unique population, often with severe bone loss and prior radiation that extends the limits of uncemented femoral reconstruction. The aims of this study were to evaluate the implant survivorship, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of MFT stems used for revision oncologic salvage.

METHODS

We identified 17 patients treated initially with primary THA for an oncologic diagnosis (15 primary oncologic, 2 metastatic disease) who underwent subsequent femoral revision with an MFT stem. Mean age at revision was 66 years and 35% of patients were female. Mean follow-up was 4 years. Before revision, 5 of 17 had undergone local radiation.

RESULTS

Ten-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was 100%. The survivorship free of any reoperation was 76%. There were no femoral component fractures. Three patients were revised for recurrent instability, and 1 patient underwent irrigation and debridement for an acute infection. At most recent follow-up, no patient had radiographic evidence of progressive femoral component subsidence or failure of osteointegration. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 29 preoperatively to 76 postoperatively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients with cancer, many of whom had severe bone loss and/or prior local radiation, being treated with revision THA, there were no revisions for femoral component loosening and no cases of implant fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

模块化带槽锥形(MFT)柄是翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)中最常使用的股骨部件。尽管如此,对于骨肿瘤保肢翻修 THA 中 MFT 柄的表现,尚无相关数据。这是一个独特的人群,常伴有严重的骨质流失和先前的放疗,这增加了非骨水泥股骨重建的难度。本研究旨在评估 MFT 柄用于骨肿瘤保肢翻修的植入物存活率、影像学结果和临床结果。

方法

我们确定了 17 名最初因骨肿瘤诊断而行初次 THA 治疗的患者(15 例原发性骨肿瘤,2 例转移性疾病),随后进行了 MFT 柄的股骨翻修。翻修时的平均年龄为 66 岁,35%的患者为女性。平均随访时间为 4 年。在翻修前,17 例中有 5 例接受了局部放疗。

结果

10 年无无菌性松动生存率为 100%。无任何再手术生存率为 76%。无股骨部件骨折。3 例患者因复发性不稳定而翻修,1 例患者因急性感染行灌洗清创术。在最近一次随访时,没有患者出现股骨部件进行性下沉或骨整合失败的影像学证据。术前平均 Harris 髋关节评分为 29 分,术后为 76 分(P <.0001)。

结论

在本系列癌症患者中,许多患者存在严重的骨质流失和/或先前的局部放疗,接受了翻修 THA 治疗,没有因股骨部件松动而进行翻修,也没有发生假体骨折。

证据等级

III 级。

相似文献

1
Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Oncologic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Game Changer?模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌性肿瘤型全髋关节翻修术中的应用:改变游戏规则者?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3692-3696. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.038. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Modular Fluted Tapered Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.模块化带槽锥形柄在无菌翻修全髋关节置换术中的应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 17;99(10):873-881. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00423.
3
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化带槽锥形柄的植入物断裂及翻修因素
Hip Int. 2024 Mar;34(2):207-214. doi: 10.1177/11207000231180065. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化与非模块化锥形带槽钛柄的区别是什么。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3108-3113. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 18.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered and Fluted Modular Stem: A Mean Follow-Up of 16 Years.使用锥形和开槽模块化柄的翻修全髋关节置换术的长期结果:平均随访 16 年。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2420-2426. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.017. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
7
Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Fluted Tapered Stems: Long-Term Follow-up of 515 Cases.采用模块化带槽锥形柄的无菌翻修全髋关节置换术:515 例的长期随访结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Aug 21;106(16):1470-1478. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00921. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
8
Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures.翻修全髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围骨折中使用的模块化带槽锥形柄下沉的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2967-2970. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中使用模块化、锥形、带槽钛股骨柄的下沉发生率及预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.057. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
Modular fluted tapered stems in two-stage reimplantation of previously infected total hip arthroplasties.在二期翻修术治疗既往感染的全髋关节置换术中使用模块化带槽锥形柄。
Bone Joint J. 2024 May 1;106-B(5 Supple B):125-132. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B5.BJJ-2023-0788.R2.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses.髋膝关节大型假体周围感染的外科治疗
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 31;60(4):583. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040583.
2
Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted, tapered, modular stem follow-up method for a mean of three years: A preliminary study.使用带槽、锥形、模块化柄进行全髋关节翻修术的平均三年随访研究:一项初步研究。
Front Physiol. 2023 May 23;14:873584. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.873584. eCollection 2023.