• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PMID:28510392
Abstract

Different measures to reduce waiting time for elective treatment in the Norwegian specialist health service have been in place. In the period from 2008 to 2010 the Norwegian directorate for health introduced 32 priority guidelines to give guided priority to either an outpatient consultation or treatment for 398 conditions, and a specified maximum waiting time. The priority guidelines were developed by 32 national grops of experts under the supervision of the Norwegian Directorate for Health. The national groups of experts defined the relevant conditions by clinical criteria and not linked to ICD-10 codes (ICD = International Codes of Diseases). In the NPR-dataset ICD-10 codes are used and the expert groups assisted in identifiing the conditions by ICD-10 codes. The administrative data used from the Norwegian Patient registry (NPR) made it possible to perform before and after analyses, the so-called interrupted time series analyses. A limitation was changes in coding practice and the reduced level of registration in 2008 on the new reporting format for data from hospitals to NPR. In all 282 of 398 conditions of the priority guidelines are analysed. Several conditions lack defined codes, and for the guideline for a limited number of conditions were assessed. System change: Two guidelines showed a significant reduction in waiting times for all conditions included; and For 21 guidelines there was seen a varying degree of compliance with the guidelines. For six guidelines there were no significant changes in waiting time at the time of the introduction of the guidelines. Some non-prioritized conditions showed positive changes. Three were not analysed due to low numbers in 2008–2009. Breach of maximum waiting times: In 2012 19 conditions had 50% or more extended waiting times per referral. Out of 183 conditions 149 had a significant decreasing trend during the years 2010–2012, whilst 7 showed an increasing trend. Harmonization between health regions: The analyses show differences in waiting time between the four hospital regions by 81% of the 234 conditions tested.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
Agreement between referral information and discharge diagnoses according to Norwegian elective treatment guidelines - a cross-sectional study.根据挪威择期治疗指南,转诊信息与出院诊断之间的一致性——一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 29;14:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0493-5.
3
Norwegian Priority Setting in Practice - an Analysis of Waiting Time Patterns Across Medical Disciplines.挪威实践中的优先排序——对各医学学科的等待时间模式的分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Mar 2;5(6):373-8. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.23.
4
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.减少择期手术等待时间的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD005610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005610.pub2.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
National guidelines for evaluating pain-Patients' legal right to prioritised health care at multidisciplinary pain clinics in Norway implemented 2009.挪威2009年实施的国家疼痛评估指南——患者在多学科疼痛诊所获得优先医疗服务的合法权利。
Scand J Pain. 2010 Jan 1;1(1):60-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2009.10.002.
9
Monitoring prioritisation in the public health-care sector by use of medical guidelines. The case of Norway.利用医疗指南监测公共医疗保健部门的优先事项。以挪威为例。
Health Econ. 2011 Aug;20(8):958-70. doi: 10.1002/hec.1659. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
10
Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.安大略省双能X线吸收法骨密度测定的应用:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(20):1-180. Epub 2006 Nov 1.