Hunt Geoffrey, Kolind Torsten, Antin Tamar
a Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark.
b Institute for Scientific Analysis , San Francisco , California.
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2018 Apr-Jun;17(2):187-198. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2017.1316223. Epub 2017 May 16.
Since the 1990s, social scientists have rejected notions of ethnicity as something static and discrete, instead highlighting the context-dependent and fluid nature of multiple identities. In spite of these developments, researchers within the substance use fields continue to assess ethnic group categories in ways that suggest little critical reflection in terms of the validity of the measurements themselves, nor the social, bureaucratic, and political decisions shaping standard measures of ethnicity. This paper highlights these considerations, while also acknowledging the role of socially-delineated ethnic categorizations in documenting health inequities and social injustices. We call on researchers in alcohol and drugs research to critically appraise their use of ethnic categorizations, querying how to best measure ethnicity within their own studies in ways that are justified beyond simplified explanations of social convention and that "do no harm" in terms of perpetuating racism and obscuring the roots causes of social and health problems related to alcohol and drugs.
自20世纪90年代以来,社会科学家摒弃了将种族视为静态和离散的观念,转而强调多重身份的情境依赖性和流动性。尽管有这些进展,但物质使用领域的研究人员在评估族群类别时,对测量本身的有效性以及塑造种族标准测量的社会、官僚和政治决策几乎没有进行批判性反思。本文强调了这些考量,同时也承认社会划定的种族分类在记录健康不平等和社会不公正方面的作用。我们呼吁酒精和毒品研究领域的研究人员批判性地评估他们对种族分类的使用,探讨如何在自己的研究中以超越简单社会习俗解释的合理方式最佳地测量种族,并且在延续种族主义以及掩盖与酒精和毒品相关的社会和健康问题的根源方面“不造成伤害”。