King James A, Deighton Kevin, Broom David R, Wasse Lucy K, Douglas Jessica A, Burns Stephen F, Cordery Philip A, Petherick Emily S, Batterham Rachel L, Goltz Fernanda R, Thackray Alice E, Yates Thomas, Stensel David J
1School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UNITED KINGDOM; 2NIHR Leicester-Loughborough, Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UNITED KINGDOM; 3Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM; 4Academy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM; 5Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM; 6Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, SINGAPORE; 7Department of Medicine, University College London, London, UNITED KINGDOM; 8NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UNITED KINGDOM; and 9College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jun;49(6):1219-1228. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001220.
This study aimed to characterize the immediate and extended effect of acute exercise on hunger, energy intake, and circulating acylated ghrelin concentrations using a large data set of homogenous experimental trials and to describe the variation in responses between individuals.
Data from 17 of our group's experimental crossover trials were aggregated yielding a total sample of 192 young, healthy males. In these studies, single bouts of moderate to high-intensity aerobic exercise (69% ± 5% V˙O2 peak; mean ± SD) were completed with detailed participant assessments occurring during and for several hours postexercise. Mean hunger ratings were determined during (n = 178) and after (n = 118) exercise from visual analog scales completed at 30-min intervals, whereas ad libitum energy intake was measured within the first hour after exercise (n = 60) and at multiple meals (n = 128) during the remainder of trials. Venous concentrations of acylated ghrelin were determined at strategic time points during (n = 118) and after (n = 89) exercise.
At group level, exercise transiently suppressed hunger (P < 0.010, Cohen's d = 0.77) but did not affect energy intake. Acylated ghrelin was suppressed during exercise (P < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.10) and remained significantly lower than control (no exercise) afterward (P < 0.024, Cohen's d = 0.61). Between participants, there were notable differences in responses; however, a large proportion of this spread lay within the boundaries of normal variation associated with biological and technical assessment error.
In young men, acute exercise suppresses hunger and circulating acylated ghrelin concentrations with notable diversity between individuals. Care must be taken to distinguish true interindividual variation from random differences within normal limits.
本研究旨在利用大量同质实验性试验数据集,描述急性运动对饥饿感、能量摄入和循环中酰基化胃饥饿素浓度的即时和长期影响,并描述个体间反应的差异。
汇总了我们小组17项实验性交叉试验的数据,得到了192名年轻健康男性的总样本。在这些研究中,完成了单次中等到高强度的有氧运动(69%±5%最大摄氧量;平均值±标准差),并在运动期间和运动后数小时对参与者进行了详细评估。在运动期间(n = 178)和运动后(n = 118),每隔30分钟通过视觉模拟量表确定平均饥饿评分,而在运动后第一小时内(n = 60)以及试验剩余时间的多餐时(n = 128)测量随意能量摄入。在运动期间(n = 118)和运动后(n = 89)的关键时间点测定静脉酰基化胃饥饿素浓度。
在组水平上,运动短暂抑制了饥饿感(P < 0.010,科恩d值 = 0.77),但不影响能量摄入。运动期间酰基化胃饥饿素受到抑制(P < 0.001,科恩d值 = 0.10),之后仍显著低于对照组(无运动)(P < 0.024,科恩d值 = 0.61)。参与者之间的反应存在显著差异;然而,这种差异的很大一部分处于与生物学和技术评估误差相关的正常变异范围内。
在年轻男性中,急性运动可抑制饥饿感和循环中酰基化胃饥饿素浓度,个体间存在显著差异。必须注意区分正常范围内真正的个体间差异和随机差异。