1 Faculty of Health Care, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
2 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Nursing Science, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Dec;31(12):1653-1663. doi: 10.1177/0269215517708328. Epub 2017 May 16.
To investigate (1) the diagnostic value of the Signs of Depression Scale (SODS) in a Likert scale format and (2) whether the Likert scale improves the diagnostic value compared with the original dichotomous scale.
Cross-sectional multicentre study.
One general and one university hospital in the Netherlands.
A total of 116 consecutive hospitalized stroke patients, of whom 53 were patients with communicative impairment.
Depression was diagnosed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) administered to the patients' relatives. The Barthel Index (BI) was used as an external validator.
The correlation between the CIDI and the SODS-Likert or the SODS was small ( r = 0.18), and the correlation between the Barthel Index and the SODS-Likert ( r = -0.30) or the SODS ( r = -0.33) was moderate. For both instruments, the discriminatory power for diagnosing depression when compared with the CIDI was best at a cut-off score of ⩾2. The internal consistency of the SODS-Likert was acceptable (α = 0.69) and slightly higher than that of the SODS (α = 0.57). The inter-rater reliability of the SODS-Likert and the SODS was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.66 and ICC 0.80, respectively). The clinical utility was rated good.
The diagnostic value of the SODS did not improve using a Likert scale format. However, the diagnostic value of the original dichotomous SODS is reasonable for the initial mood assessment of stroke patients with communicative impairment.
(1)调查 Signs of Depression Scale(SODS)在李克特量表格式下的诊断价值,(2)李克特量表是否比原始的二分尺度提高了诊断价值。
横断面多中心研究。
荷兰的一家综合医院和一家大学医院。
共纳入 116 例连续住院的脑卒中患者,其中 53 例患者存在交流障碍。
使用对患者亲属进行的复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)对抑郁进行诊断。使用巴氏指数(BI)作为外部验证器。
CIDI 与 SODS-Likert 或 SODS 的相关性较小(r=0.18),BI 与 SODS-Likert(r=-0.30)或 SODS(r=-0.33)的相关性为中等。对于两种仪器,与 CIDI 相比,当截断值为≥2 时,诊断抑郁的区分能力最佳。SODS-Likert 的内部一致性可接受(α=0.69),略高于 SODS(α=0.57)。SODS-Likert 和 SODS 的组内相关系数(ICC)分别为 0.66 和 0.80,可接受。临床实用性的评价良好。
使用李克特量表格式并未提高 SODS 的诊断价值。然而,对于存在交流障碍的脑卒中患者的初始情绪评估,原始二分 SODS 的诊断价值是合理的。