• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。

Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Panuccio Francescaroberta, Rossi Giulia, Di Nuzzo Anita, Ruotolo Ilaria, Cianfriglia Giada, Simeon Rachele, Sellitto Giovanni, Berardi Anna, Galeoto Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università, 30, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Department of Public Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci15030271
PMID:40149792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11940547/
Abstract

: Aphasia is a neurological condition affecting the ability to understand and/or express language fluently and accurately, and can occur following stroke, traumatic injuries, or other brain pathologies. The aim of the following study was to provide clinicians and researchers information regarding the existing assessment tools to assess aphasia. : For this Systematic Review, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles published up to August 2024. Authors independently identified eligible studies based on predefined inclusion criteria and extracted data. The study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Of the 1278 publications identified and screened, 238 studies fell within the inclusion criteria and were critically reviewed, and 164 assessment tools were found and divided into 8 main domains; the most used tools were the Language Screening Test (LAST), the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39), the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS), and the Token test. : This review has emphasized the need for agreement among researchers as to which tool must be studied or adapted to other national contexts to develop universal norms and standards.

摘要

失语症是一种神经疾病,会影响流畅且准确地理解和/或表达语言的能力,可在中风、创伤性损伤或其他脑部病变后发生。以下研究的目的是为临床医生和研究人员提供有关现有失语症评估工具的信息。

对于这项系统评价,检索了截至2024年8月在PubMed、CINAHL、科学网和Scopus上发表的文章。作者根据预先确定的纳入标准独立识别符合条件的研究并提取数据。使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估研究质量和偏倚风险。在识别和筛选的1278篇出版物中,238项研究符合纳入标准并进行了严格审查,共发现164种评估工具并分为8个主要领域;使用最多的工具是语言筛查测试(LAST)、中风与失语症生活质量量表-39(SAQOL-39)、牛津认知筛查(OCS)和代币测试。

本综述强调研究人员需要就必须研究哪种工具或使其适用于其他国家背景以制定通用规范和标准达成一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4327/11940547/d887f673fbeb/brainsci-15-00271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4327/11940547/d887f673fbeb/brainsci-15-00271-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4327/11940547/d887f673fbeb/brainsci-15-00271-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The outcome measures for loss of functionality in the activities of daily living of adults after stroke: a systematic review.中风后成年人日常生活活动功能丧失的结局指标:一项系统评价
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Apr;26(3):236-245. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1574060. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.社区和机构环境中老年人虐待情况测量工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 29;20(3):e1419. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Tools for Assessing Quality of Life in People with Stroke-Induced Aphasia: A Literature Review.评估中风后失语症患者生活质量的工具:文献综述
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024 Sep 12:1-19. doi: 10.1159/000541400.
6
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
7
A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties of Knee-Related Outcome Measures Translated, Cross-Culturally Adapted, and Validated in Arabic Language.对以阿拉伯语翻译、跨文化适应并验证的膝关节相关结局测量工具的心理测量学特性的系统评价。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;10(9):1631. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091631.
8
Psychometric Properties of Food Frequency Questionnaires Used in Dentistry: A Systematic Review.牙科中使用的食物频率问卷的心理测量特性:系统评价。
Caries Res. 2023;57(2):95-105. doi: 10.1159/000529886. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Psychometric properties of self-report concussion scales and checklists.自我报告脑震荡量表和清单的心理计量特性。
J Athl Train. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):221-3. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.2.221.
10
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and prognosis of language impairment in subcortical aphasia of acute stroke patients.急性脑卒中患者皮质下失语症语言障碍的特征与预后
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1630365. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630365. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study.《沟通有效性指数(CETI)的希腊语改编:一项信效度研究》
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):689. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070689.
2
Psychometric Properties of Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test in an Italian Population with Parkinson's Disease.杰布森·泰勒手部功能测试在意大利帕金森病患者群体中的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 6;12(13):1351. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131351.
3
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.
报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 年 OMIs 版。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111422. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111422. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Validation of a Cantonese Version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT): A functional approach.中文验证:阿姆斯特丹-奈梅亨日常语言测试(CANELT)的粤语版本:一种功能方法。
PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0303810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303810. eCollection 2024.
5
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Reliability of the picture description task of the Western Aphasia Battery - revised in Laurentian French persons without brain injury.《洛矶山失语症评估修订版图片描述任务在无脑损伤的劳伦森法语人群中的信度》
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Nov;38(8):1980-2008. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2340777. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
7
The Korean Version of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (K-OCS) Normative Study.《牛津认知筛查量表韩国版(K-OCS)的常模研究》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Feb;48(1):22-30. doi: 10.5535/arm.23149. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Musculoskeletal Pain Intensity and Interference Questionnaire for Musicians-Italian Version (MPIIQM-IT): Multicenter Validation, Translation and Cultural Adaptation.音乐家肌肉骨骼疼痛强度和干扰问卷-意大利语版(MPIIQM-IT):多中心验证、翻译和文化调适。
Med Probl Perform Art. 2024 Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2024.1005.
9
Turkish validity and reliability study on the quick aphasia battery.《快速失语症成套测验》的土耳其语效度和信度研究
Brain Behav. 2024 Jan;14(1):e3343. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3343.
10
Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: an update of a systematic review.儿童和青少年执行功能评估工具:系统评价更新。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Apr;24(4):487-508. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2311872. Epub 2024 Feb 6.