Suppr超能文献

生物类似药:临床试验最新进展(已发表及正在进行的研究综述)

Biosimilars: An Update on Clinical Trials (Review of Published and Ongoing Studies).

作者信息

Olteanu Rodica, Zota Alexandra, Constantin Magda

机构信息

Alexandra Zota, MD, Colentina Clinical Hospital Dermatology Department, 19-21 Stefan cel Mare Street, 020125 Bucharest, Romania;

出版信息

Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2017 Apr;25(1):57-66.

Abstract

Biosimilars represent a new trend in the treatment of many immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Regulatory requirements for approval of biosimilars are different from those of originators and rely mostly on the evidence generated from bioequivalence studies and in particular from RCTs. Our goal in this review was to search for relevant studies from randomized controlled trials on the biosimilars adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab compared with their reference medication (publication in Medline) and ongoing studies in clinical trial registries. For infliximab biosimilars, we found data on patients with ankylosing spondylitis rheumatoid arthritis indicating no clinically relevant differences regarding efficacy and safety, as well as data on inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis. In addition, three registered studies of adalimumab biosimilars and just one study of an etanercept biosimilar were being carried out in patients with psoriasis. Ongoing studies on adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis were also identified. The conclusion seems to be that there are only 4 clinical trials on psoriasis (3 for the adalimumab biosimilar and 1 for etanercept biosimilar) and 1 clinical trial for Pso, CD, UC, RA, and AS (with the Infliximab biosimilar). Thus, the real and unique advantage of biosimilars is the low price derived from the special design studies despite the high technology used in fabrication process. Although not all ongoing biosimilar trials may have been registered, the present situation in terms of registered trials is quite unsatisfactory and provision of further clinical data and inclusion of patients in patient registries will be crucial.

摘要

生物类似药代表了许多免疫介导的炎症性疾病治疗的新趋势。生物类似药的批准监管要求与原研药不同,主要依赖于生物等效性研究尤其是随机对照试验产生的证据。我们本次综述的目的是在随机对照试验中搜索有关阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗和乌司奴单抗这几种生物类似药与其对照药物比较的相关研究(发表于Medline)以及临床试验注册中心正在进行的研究。对于英夫利昔单抗生物类似药,我们发现了有关强直性脊柱炎、类风湿关节炎患者的数据,表明在疗效和安全性方面无临床相关差异,还有关于炎症性肠病和银屑病的数据。此外,正在对银屑病患者开展三项阿达木单抗生物类似药的注册研究,而依那西普生物类似药仅有一项研究。还确定了正在对类风湿关节炎患者开展的阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗生物类似药的研究。结论似乎是,银屑病方面仅有4项临床试验(3项针对阿达木单抗生物类似药,1项针对依那西普生物类似药),而银屑病、克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎、类风湿关节炎和强直性脊柱炎方面仅有1项临床试验(针对英夫利昔单抗生物类似药)。因此,尽管生物类似药在制造过程中采用了高科技,但其实质且独特的优势在于通过特殊设计研究实现的低价格。尽管并非所有正在进行的生物类似药试验都已注册,但就已注册试验的现状而言相当不尽人意,提供更多临床数据并将患者纳入患者注册库至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验