Suppr超能文献

轻度认知障碍是否过度强调发表论文以促进医学教师的晋升?

Is MCI over emphasising publication for promotion of medical teachers?

作者信息

Jain Shobhit, Jain Harjeet, Jain Ashok Kumar

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP 221 005 India,.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP 202 002 India,.

出版信息

Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr-Jun;2(2):131-132. doi: 10.20529/ijme.2017.034.

Abstract

Over the past year, there has been constant debate in various journals on the circular issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI) in September 2015, regarding the requirements for promotion of teaching faculty. The lack of a time-bound promotion system of medical faculty results in higher stress, dissatisfaction, lower productivity and quality of life and work. The critics have highlighted several issues in assessment of publication for teacher's promotion, eg the exclusion of publications in "electronic-only" journals, awarding points only to "original research" papers and first or second authors, listing of indexing databases for journals, categorising journals as national or international.

摘要

在过去一年里,各类期刊一直在就印度医学委员会(MCI)于2015年9月发布的关于教师晋升要求的通知展开持续辩论。医学教师缺乏有时限的晋升制度会导致更高的压力、不满情绪、更低的生产力以及生活和工作质量下降。批评者们强调了教师晋升发表评估中的几个问题,例如排除“仅电子版”期刊上的发表成果、仅给“原创研究”论文以及第一或第二作者加分、列出期刊的索引数据库、将期刊分为国内或国际期刊。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验