Ng Felix C, Low Essie, Andrew Emily, Smith Karen, Campbell Bruce C V, Hand Peter J, Crompton Douglas E, Wijeratne Tissa, Dewey Helen M, Choi Philip M
From the Department of Neurology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia (F.C.N., D.E.C.); Department of Neurology, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia (E.L., T.W.); Research and Evaluation Department, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Australia (E.A., K.S.); Department of Epidemiology and Prevention Medicine, Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice (K.S.) and Department of Neurosciences, Eastern Health, Eastern Health Clinical School (H.M.D., P.M.C.), Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine and Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital (B.C.V.C., P.J.H.), Epilepsy Research Center (D.E.C.), and Department of Medicine, Western Precinct (T.W.), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale (T.W.).
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1976-1979. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017235. Epub 2017 May 16.
Interhospital transfer is a critical component in the treatment of acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusive stroke transferred for mechanical thrombectomy. Real-world data for benchmarking and theoretical modeling are limited. We sought to characterize transfer workflow from primary stroke center (PSC) to comprehensive stroke center after the publication of positive thrombectomy trials.
Consecutive patients transferred from 3 high-volume PSCs to a single comprehensive stroke center between January 2015 and August 2016 were included in a retrospective study. Factors associated with key time metrics were analyzed with emphasis on PSC intrahospital workflow.
Sixty-seven patients were identified. Median age was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR], 63.5-78) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 17 (IQR, 12-21). Median transfer time measured by PSC-door-to-comprehensive stroke center-door was 128 minutes (IQR, 107-164), of which 82.8% was spent at PSCs (door-in-door-out [DIDO]; 106 minutes; IQR, 86-143). The lengthiest component of DIDO was computed-tomography-to-retrieval-request (median 59.5 minutes; IQR, 44-83). The 37.3% had DIDO exceeding 120 minutes. DIDO times differed significantly between PSCs (=0.01). In multivariate analyses, rerecruiting the initial ambulance crew for transfer (<0.01) and presentation during working hours (=0.04) were associated with shorter DIDO times.
In a metropolitan hub-and-spoke network, PSC-door-to-comprehensive stroke center-door and DIDO times are long even in high-volume PSCs. Improving PSC workflow represents a major opportunity to expedite mechanical thrombectomy and improve patient outcomes.
院间转运是接受机械取栓治疗的急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中治疗中的关键环节。用于基准测试和理论建模的真实世界数据有限。我们试图在取栓试验取得阳性结果后,描述从初级卒中中心(PSC)到综合卒中中心的转运工作流程。
对2015年1月至2016年8月间从3个高流量PSC连续转运至单一综合卒中中心的患者进行回顾性研究。分析与关键时间指标相关的因素,重点关注PSC院内工作流程。
共纳入67例患者。中位年龄为74岁(四分位间距[IQR],63.5 - 78),美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分为17分(IQR,12 - 21)。以PSC门到综合卒中中心门测量的中位转运时间为128分钟(IQR,107 - 164),其中82.8%的时间花费在PSC(门进 - 门出[DIDO];106分钟;IQR,86 - 143)。DIDO最长的部分是计算机断层扫描到取回请求(中位时间59.5分钟;IQR,44 - 83)。37.3%的患者DIDO超过120分钟。不同PSC之间的DIDO时间差异有统计学意义(=0.01)。多因素分析显示,重新招募最初的救护人员进行转运(<0.01)和在工作时间就诊(=0.04)与较短的DIDO时间相关。
在大都市的中心辐射型网络中,即使在高流量的PSC,PSC门到综合卒中中心门以及DIDO时间也很长。改善PSC工作流程是加快机械取栓并改善患者预后的主要机会。