Gupta Amar C, Wang Weiping, Shah Chintan, Sands Mark J, Bullen Jennifer, Remer Erick M, Bayona Pilar M, Carey William, Kapoor Baljendra
Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1723-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1694-1. Epub 2017 May 16.
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) were historically placed using uncovered bare-metal stents. Current practice has now shifted toward the use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stents, given the improved primary patency seen with these stents. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any added value, such as overall survival or stent patency, when using covered stents versus uncovered stents in TIPS placement in a large cohort.
From April 1995 to June 2012, a total of 744 consecutive adult patients underwent de novo TIPS placement (378 receiving uncovered stents, 366 receiving covered stents). Information was obtained on demographics, baseline clinical variables, and outcomes after TIPS placement. Data were collected, compared, and analyzed to assess outcomes including mortality, primary patency (determined via repeat intervention), and secondary patency (determined via ultrasound parameters).
Covered stents were associated with significantly improved primary patency (P < 0.001) and secondary patency (P < 0.001) when compared with uncovered stents in TIPS procedures. Additionally, covered stents were associated with higher estimated overall survival rates and higher survival rates when TIPS was performed emergently and in patients with higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. For example, in patients with MELD scores between 11 and 18, there was a predicted survival of 59.2% with covered stents versus 42.8% with uncovered stents at 1 year.
This study demonstrated that covered stents offer the additional value of higher estimated overall survival and higher estimated survival in patients undergoing TIPS emergently and in those with higher MELD scores when compared to uncovered stents.
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在历史上使用的是无覆膜裸金属支架。鉴于使用这些支架可改善初始通畅率,目前的做法已转向使用聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)覆膜支架。本研究的目的是确定在一大群患者中进行TIPS置入时,使用覆膜支架与无覆膜支架相比是否有任何附加价值,如总生存率或支架通畅率。
从1995年4月至2012年6月,共有744例成年患者连续接受了初次TIPS置入(378例接受无覆膜支架,366例接受覆膜支架)。获取了患者的人口统计学信息、基线临床变量以及TIPS置入后的结局。收集、比较和分析数据以评估包括死亡率、初始通畅率(通过重复干预确定)和次级通畅率(通过超声参数确定)等结局。
在TIPS手术中,与无覆膜支架相比,覆膜支架的初始通畅率(P < 0.001)和次级通畅率(P < 0.001)显著提高。此外,覆膜支架与更高的估计总生存率以及在紧急进行TIPS时和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分较高的患者中的更高生存率相关。例如,在MELD评分介于11至18之间的患者中,覆膜支架在1年时的预测生存率为59.2%,而无覆膜支架为42.8%。
本研究表明,与无覆膜支架相比,覆膜支架在紧急接受TIPS的患者以及MELD评分较高的患者中具有更高的估计总生存率和更高的估计生存率这一附加价值。