Suppr超能文献

系统评价与荟萃分析:内镜扩张术对嗜酸性食管炎儿童和成人非常有效且安全。

Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic dilation is highly effective and safe in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis.

作者信息

Moawad F J, Molina-Infante J, Lucendo A J, Cantrell S E, Tmanova L, Douglas K M

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara, Caceres, Spain.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;46(2):96-105. doi: 10.1111/apt.14123. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal dilation is frequently used as an adjunct treatment to alleviate symptoms that develop from fibrostenotic remodelling in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Earlier reports described an increased risk of complications associated with dilation.

AIM

Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilation in children and adults with EoE.

METHODS

Professional librarians searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles in any language describing studies of dilation in EoE through December 2016. Studies were selected and data were abstracted independently and in duplicate. Random effects modelling was used to generate summary estimates for clinical improvement and complications (haemorrhage, perforation, hospitalisation, and death).

RESULTS

The search resulted in 3495 references, of which 27 studies were included in the final analysis. The studies described 845 EoE patients, including 87 paediatric patients, who underwent a total of 1820 oesophageal dilations. The median number of dilations was 3 (range: 1-35). Clinical improvement occurred in 95% of patients (95% CI: 90%-98%, I : 10%, 17 studies). Perforation occurred in 0.38% (95% CI: 0.18%-0.85%, I : 0%, 27 studies), haemorrhage in 0.05% (95% CI: 0%-0.3%, I : 0%, 18 studies), and hospitalisation in 0.67% (95% CI: 0.3%-1.1%, I : 44%, 24 studies). No deaths occurred (95% CI: 0%-0.2% I : 0%, 25 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic dilation is consistently effective in children and adults with EoE, resulting in improvement in 95% of patients with very low rates (<1%) of major complications.

摘要

背景

食管扩张术常被用作辅助治疗手段,以缓解嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)中纤维狭窄重塑所引发的症状。早期报告称扩张术相关并发症风险增加。

目的

进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估内镜下扩张术对儿童和成人EoE患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

专业图书馆员检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus和Web of Science,查找截至2016年12月任何语言描述EoE扩张术研究的文章。研究被筛选出来,数据由两人独立且重复提取。采用随机效应模型生成临床改善和并发症(出血、穿孔、住院和死亡)的汇总估计值。

结果

检索得到3495篇参考文献,最终分析纳入27项研究。这些研究描述了845例EoE患者,其中包括87例儿科患者,共进行了1820次食管扩张术。扩张术的中位数为3次(范围:1 - 35次)。95%的患者临床症状得到改善(95%置信区间:90% - 98%,I²:10%,17项研究)。穿孔发生率为0.38%(95%置信区间:0.18% - 0.85%,I²:0%,27项研究),出血发生率为0.05%(95%置信区间:0% - 0.3%,I²:0%,18项研究),住院发生率为0.67%(95%置信区间:0.3% - 1.1%,I²:44%,24项研究)。无死亡病例发生(95%置信区间:0% - 0.2%,I²:0%,25项研究)。

结论

内镜下扩张术对儿童和成人EoE患者始终有效,95%的患者症状得到改善,主要并发症发生率极低(<1%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验