Espenschied Carin R, LaDuca Holly, Li Shuwei, McFarland Rachel, Gau Chia-Ling, Hampel Heather
Carin R. Espenschied, Holly LaDuca, Shuwei Li, Rachel McFarland, and Chia-Ling Gau, Ambry Genetics, Clinical Diagnostics, Aliso Viejo, CA; and Heather Hampel, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2568-2575. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.9260. Epub 2017 May 17.
Purpose Most existing literature describes Lynch syndrome (LS) as a hereditary syndrome leading to high risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer mainly as a result of mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. Most of these studies were performed on cohorts with disease suggestive of hereditary CRC and population-based CRC and endometrial cancer cohorts, possibly biasing results. We aimed to describe a large cohort of mismatch repair (MMR) mutation carriers ascertained through multigene panel testing, evaluate their phenotype, and compare the results with those of previous studies. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical histories of patients who had multigene panel testing, including the MMR and EPCAM genes, between March 2012 and June 2015 (N = 34,981) and performed a series of statistical comparisons. Results Overall, MSH6 mutations were most frequent, followed by PMS2, MSH2, MLH1, and EPCAM mutations, respectively. Of 528 patients who had MMR mutations, 63 (11.9%) had breast cancer only and 144 (27.3%) had CRC only. When comparing those with breast cancer only to those with CRC only, MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations ( P = 2.3 × 10). Of the 528 patients, 22.2% met BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) testing criteria and not LS criteria, and 5.1% met neither BRCA1/2 nor LS testing criteria. MSH6 and PMS2 mutations were more frequent than MLH1 and MSH2 mutations among patients who met BRCA1/2 testing criteria but did not meet LS testing criteria ( P = 4.3 × 10). Conclusion These results provide a new perspective on LS and suggest that individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations may present with a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer phenotype. These data also highlight the limitations of current testing criteria in identifying these patients, as well as the need for further investigation of cancer risks in patients with MMR mutations.
目的 大多数现有文献将林奇综合征(LS)描述为一种遗传性综合征,主要由于MLH1和MSH2基因突变导致结直肠癌(CRC)和子宫内膜癌的高风险。这些研究大多是在提示遗传性CRC的队列以及基于人群的CRC和子宫内膜癌队列中进行的,可能会使结果产生偏差。我们旨在描述通过多基因检测确定的一大群错配修复(MMR)突变携带者,评估他们的表型,并将结果与以前的研究进行比较。方法 我们回顾性地审查了2012年3月至2015年6月期间进行多基因检测(包括MMR和EPCAM基因)的患者的临床病史(N = 34,981),并进行了一系列统计比较。结果 总体而言,MSH6突变最常见,其次分别是PMS2、MSH2、MLH1和EPCAM突变。在528例有MMR突变的患者中,63例(11.9%)仅患有乳腺癌,144例(27.3%)仅患有CRC。将仅患有乳腺癌的患者与仅患有CRC的患者进行比较时,MSH6和PMS2突变比MLH1和MSH2突变更常见(P = 2.3×10)。在528例患者中,22.2%符合BRCA1和BRCA2(BRCA1/2)检测标准但不符合LS标准,5.1%既不符合BRCA1/2也不符合LS检测标准。在符合BRCA1/2检测标准但不符合LS检测标准的患者中,MSH6和PMS2突变比MLH1和MSH2突变更常见(P = 4.3×10)。结论 这些结果为LS提供了新的视角,并表明具有MSH6和PMS2突变的个体可能表现出遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌表型。这些数据还突出了当前检测标准在识别这些患者方面的局限性,以及对MMR突变患者癌症风险进行进一步研究的必要性。