• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对大麻治疗用途的生物伦理分析:综合评论。

Bioethical analysis to the therapeutic use of Cannabis: Integrative review.

机构信息

Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Brazil.

Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Brazil.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2019 Feb;26(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/0969733017703699. Epub 2017 May 17.

DOI:10.1177/0969733017703699
PMID:28514883
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: Despite being considered as a contravention under some countries' legislation, the therapeutic use of Cannabis sativa has been growing in Brazil, due to the promising results observed in many pathologies. Such a scenario has fostered the need to deepen discussions on the subject and possibly revise legislation governing the substance use and access.

OBJECTIVES

: Identify the types of stigma related to the therapeutic use of Cannabis and describe the strategies people use to overcome stigma.

METHODS

: This integrative review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, with 565 articles being retrieved. Triads' cross-check were done, first maintaining the "cannabis" and "therapeutic use" pair, added by "stigma," "bioethics," "ethics," "social consequences," and "legal consequences." The final selection resulted in six articles.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATION

: However, the ethical issues that pervade and regulate decisions on this subject must be considered.

RESULTS

: Different dimensions and types of stigma related to the therapeutic use of Cannabis have been identified. The bioethical principle of autonomy was an expression of citizenship and human rights, mitigating internal conflicts related to self-stigma and the effects of external stigma on the person's life.

CONCLUSION

: It was possible to identify the types of stigma related to the therapeutic use of Cannabis is an internal dimension represented (self-stigma) and an external dimension, represented (social and structural stigmas) and to identify strategies adopted to face this stigma: skills training group for users, elaboration of laws and specific programs to clarify the therapeutic use of Cannabis with a greater social scope, and support for family members. Thus, contributing to the building of people's autonomy in a broader context of decision-making autonomy and executive autonomy will provide the development of people's capacity to perform complex tasks of self-management and, consequently, to continue promoting and preserving their decision-making process and their capacity to plan and perform tasks associated with managing their lives and their treatments.

摘要

简介

尽管在一些国家的立法中被视为违法行为,但由于在许多疾病中观察到有希望的结果,医用大麻的使用在巴西不断增加。这种情况促使人们需要更深入地讨论这个问题,并可能修改管理该物质使用和获取的立法。

目的

确定与医用大麻使用相关的污名类型,并描述人们用来克服污名的策略。

方法

这是一项综合回顾性研究,在 PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行,共检索到 565 篇文章。首先通过“大麻”和“医用”这对关键词,然后添加“污名”、“生物伦理学”、“伦理学”、“社会后果”和“法律后果”,对三对关键词进行了交叉核对。最终选择了六篇文章。

伦理考虑

然而,必须考虑影响和规范这个主题决策的伦理问题。

结果

确定了与医用大麻使用相关的不同维度和类型的污名。自主的生物伦理原则是公民和人权的体现,减轻了与自我污名相关的内部冲突,以及外部污名对个人生活的影响。

结论

可以确定与医用大麻使用相关的污名类型是一种内部维度的表现(自我污名)和一种外部维度的表现(社会和结构性污名),并确定了应对这种污名的策略:为使用者提供小组技能培训、制定法律和具体计划,以更广泛的社会范围澄清医用大麻的使用,并为家庭成员提供支持。因此,在更广泛的决策自主性和执行自主性背景下,培养人们的自主性将有助于提高人们执行自我管理复杂任务的能力,从而继续促进和保护他们的决策过程以及规划和执行与管理生活和治疗相关任务的能力。

相似文献

1
Bioethical analysis to the therapeutic use of Cannabis: Integrative review.对大麻治疗用途的生物伦理分析:综合评论。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Feb;26(1):96-104. doi: 10.1177/0969733017703699. Epub 2017 May 17.
2
Medical cannabis and stigma: A qualitative study with patients living with chronic pain.医用大麻与污名:一项针对慢性疼痛患者的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):1103-1114. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16340. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
The use of cannabis in response to the opioid crisis: A review of the literature.应对阿片类药物危机中使用大麻:文献综述。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
4
The Role of Medicinal Cannabis in Clinical Therapy: Pharmacists' Perspectives.药用大麻在临床治疗中的作用:药剂师的观点。
PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155113. eCollection 2016.
5
Nursing support for older people's autonomy in residential care: An integrative review.老年人在居住护理中自主的护理支持:一项综合评价。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 Mar;17(2):e12428. doi: 10.1111/opn.12428. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Medical cannabis-related stigma: cancer survivors' perspectives.医疗大麻相关污名:癌症幸存者的观点。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Aug;17(4):951-956. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01297-7. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
7
Comprehensive Review of Medicinal Marijuana, Cannabinoids, and Therapeutic Implications in Medicine and Headache: What a Long Strange Trip It's Been ….医用大麻、大麻素及其在医学和头痛治疗中的意义综述:这是一段多么漫长而奇特的旅程啊……
Headache. 2015 Jun;55(6):885-916. doi: 10.1111/head.12570. Epub 2015 May 25.
8
Perceived support for medical cannabis use among approved medical cannabis users in Canada.加拿大已批准的医用大麻使用者对医用大麻使用的感知支持度。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):627-636. doi: 10.1111/dar.12823. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
A qualitative review of cannabis stigmas at the twilight of prohibition.对大麻污名在禁令末期的定性综述。
J Cannabis Res. 2020 Dec 7;2(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s42238-020-00056-8.
10
Stigma-related barriers to medical cannabis as harm reduction for substance use disorder: Obstacles and opportunities for improvement.与污名相关的医用大麻作为物质使用障碍减少伤害的障碍:改进的障碍和机会。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Feb;33(1):195-201. doi: 10.1111/inm.13231. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The case for medicinal cannabis.药用大麻的情况。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 May;187(2):539-540. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1770-9. Epub 2018 Feb 24.