Hollin Gregory
School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, UK.
Sci Cult (Lond). 2017 Apr 3;26(2):209-231. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2016.1238886. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
Autism is a highly uncertain entity and little is said about it with any degree of certainty. Scientists must, and do, work through these uncertainties in the course of their work. Scientists explain uncertainty in autism research through discussion of which suggest that diverse methods and techniques make results hard to reconcile, which suggest doubt over taxonomic coherence, but also through reference to autism's which suggests that the condition is inherently heterogeneous. Indeed, indeterminacy takes two forms-an inter-personal form which suggests that there are fundamental differences between individuals with autism and an intra-personal form which suggests that no one factor is able to explain all features of autism within a given individual. What is apparent in the case of autism is that scientists put uncertainty and indeterminacy into discussion with one another and, rather than a well-policed epistemic-ontic boundary, there is a movement between, and an entwinement of, the two. Understanding scientists' dialogue concerning uncertainty and indeterminacy is of importance for understanding autism and autistic heterogeneity but also for understanding uncertainty and 'uncertainty work' within science more generally.
自闭症是一个极不确定的概念,几乎没有什么能确定地描述它。科学家们在工作过程中必须且确实要应对这些不确定性。科学家们通过讨论来解释自闭症研究中的不确定性,这些讨论表明不同的方法和技术使得结果难以协调一致,表明对分类学连贯性存在疑问,还通过提及自闭症的 (此处原文似乎不完整),这表明该病症本质上具有异质性。事实上,不确定性有两种形式——一种人际形式,表明自闭症患者个体之间存在根本差异;另一种个体内形式,表明没有一个因素能够解释特定个体自闭症的所有特征。在自闭症的案例中显而易见的是,科学家们将不确定性和非确定性相互进行讨论,而且,两者之间并非存在严格管控的认知 - 本体边界,而是相互交融、相互缠绕。理解科学家们关于不确定性和非确定性的对话,不仅对于理解自闭症和自闭症的异质性很重要,而且对于更广泛地理解科学中的不确定性和“不确定性工作”也很重要。