LA Salle D Taylor, Shute Robert, Heesch Matthew, Slivka Dustin
School of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2017 May 1;10(3):454-464. doi: 10.70252/KKDM7561. eCollection 2017.
The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) recommends adults participate in weekly aerobic activity for a minimum of 30 minutes moderate intensity exercise 5 days per week or 20 minutes of vigorous activity 3 days per week. The electrically assisted bicycle may help individuals achieve the ACSM's aerobic recommendations and introduce inactive individuals to physical activity. To compare the physiological requirements of riding a bicycle with electric pedal assist versus non-assist among healthy active young adults. 6 males and 6 females completed two randomized cycling trials using electric pedal assist (PAB) and non-assist (NON). Cycling trials were completed over a 3.54 km course with varying terrain. Time to completion was faster in the PAB (12.5 ± 0.3 min) than the NON (13.8 ± 0.3 min, p=0.01). Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was lower in the PAB (12.0 ± 0.4) than the NON (14.8 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean VO between PAB (2.3 ± 0.1 L·min) and NON (2.5 ± 0.1 L·min, p=0.45). There was no difference in mean power output when comparing PAB (115 ± 11 Watts) to NON (128 ± 11 Watts, p=0.38). There was no difference in heart rate between PAB (147 ± 5 bpm) and NON (149 ± 5 bpm, p=0.77). Recreationally active younger (college age) individuals may self-select a similar physiological intensity of physical activity regardless of mechanical assistance, resulting in quicker completion of a commuting task with PAB. Both the PAB and NON exercise bouts met ACSM criteria for vigorous exercise.
美国运动医学学会(ACSM)建议成年人每周进行有氧运动,每周至少5天进行30分钟中等强度运动,或每周3天进行20分钟剧烈运动。电动助力自行车可能有助于个人达到ACSM的有氧运动建议,并使不活跃的人开始进行体育活动。为了比较健康活跃的年轻成年人在使用电动踏板助力骑行与非助力骑行时的生理需求。6名男性和6名女性完成了两项随机骑行试验,分别使用电动踏板助力(PAB)和非助力(NON)。骑行试验在一条3.54公里、地形多样的路线上完成。PAB组完成时间(12.5±0.3分钟)比NON组(13.8±0.3分钟,p = 0.01)更快。主观用力程度(RPE)评分PAB组(12.0±0.4)低于NON组(14.8±0.5,p<0.001)。PAB组(2.3±0.1升·分钟)和NON组(2.5±0.1升·分钟,p = 0.45)之间的平均摄氧量没有差异。比较PAB组(115±11瓦)和NON组(128±11瓦,p = 0.38)时,平均功率输出没有差异。PAB组(147±5次/分钟)和NON组(149±5次/分钟,p = 0.77)之间的心率没有差异。有娱乐活动习惯的年轻(大学年龄)个体,无论有无机械辅助,可能会自我选择相似的生理运动强度,从而使用PAB更快完成通勤任务。PAB组和NON组的运动回合均符合ACSM的剧烈运动标准。