Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School of Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ, UK.
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 21;15(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8.
Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have been highlighted as a method of active travel that could overcome some of the commonly reported barriers to cycle commuting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the health benefits associated with e-cycling.
A systematic literature review of studies examining physical activity, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and psychological outcomes associated with e-cycling. Where possible these outcomes were compared to those from conventional cycling and walking. Seven electronic databases, clinical trial registers, grey literature and reference lists were searched up to November 2017. Hand searching occurred until June 2018. Experimental or observational studies examining the impact of e-cycling on physical activity and/or health outcomes of interest were included. E-bikes used must have pedals and require pedalling for electric assistance to be provided.
Seventeen studies (11 acute experiments, 6 longitudinal interventions) were identified involving a total of 300 participants. There was moderate evidence that e-cycling provided physical activity of at least moderate intensity, which was lower than the intensity elicited during conventional cycling, but higher than that during walking. There was also moderate evidence that e-cycling can improve cardiorespiratory fitness in physically inactive individuals. Evidence of the impact of e-cycling on metabolic and psychological health outcomes was inconclusive. Longitudinal evidence was compromised by weak study design and quality.
E-cycling can contribute to meeting physical activity recommendations and increasing physical fitness. As such, e-bikes offer a potential alternative to conventional cycling. Future research should examine the long-term health impacts of e-cycling using rigorous research designs.
电动助力自行车(e-bike)作为一种主动出行方式,已被强调可以克服一些通常被报道的阻碍自行车通勤的因素。本系统综述的目的是评估与电动自行车骑行相关的健康益处。
对研究体力活动、心肺、代谢和心理结果与电动自行车骑行之间关系的文献进行系统综述。在可能的情况下,将这些结果与传统自行车骑行和步行的结果进行比较。检索了 7 个电子数据库、临床试验登记处、灰色文献和参考文献列表,检索时间截至 2017 年 11 月。2018 年 6 月之前进行了手工检索。纳入的研究包括检验电动自行车对体力活动和/或健康结果影响的实验或观察性研究。所使用的电动自行车必须有脚踏板,并且需要踩踏脚踏板才能提供电力辅助。
共确定了 17 项研究(11 项急性实验,6 项纵向干预),涉及 300 名参与者。有中等证据表明,电动自行车骑行可提供至少中等强度的体力活动,其强度低于传统自行车骑行,但高于步行。也有中等证据表明,电动自行车骑行可以提高身体不活跃者的心肺健康。电动自行车骑行对代谢和心理健康结果的影响的证据尚无定论。纵向证据受到研究设计和质量薄弱的影响。
电动自行车骑行可以帮助达到体力活动建议并提高身体健康水平。因此,电动自行车为传统自行车骑行提供了一种潜在的替代方案。未来的研究应使用严格的研究设计来检验电动自行车骑行的长期健康影响。