Kreepala Chatchai, Sangpanich Aroonchai, Boonchoo Phirudee, Rungsrithananon Warit
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand.
Hemodialysis Unit, HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakornnayok, Thailand.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 May 3;18:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.04.019. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Dialyzer reprocessing machines have replaced human labor in preparing re-usable dialyzers. It also made the process of total cell volume (TCV) measurement become faster. Nevertheless, there has been a lack of data on efficacy of weight evaluation on TCV by machine compared to volume evaluation by the conventional method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TCV measurement performed by Kidney-Kleen reprocessing machine, produced by MEDITOP Company in Thailand, compared to that of the conventional method.
This prospective cohort study was performed during September 2014 to December 2015.The low-flux (N = 101) and high-flux dialyzers (N = 100) were included for TCV evaluation. Reused times were up to 5 in the low-flux and 20 in the high-flux dialyzers. The Bland Altman analysis was used to evaluate value measured by different methods.
The values measured by weight evaluation (by machine) were higher than those obtained by volumetric evaluation of the conventional method in the low-flux (0.81 ± 0.20%) and high-flux (1.32 ± 0.39%) dialyzers. The correlation of TCV values of the two methods were r = 0.98, < and r = 0.71, p < 0.001 for the low- and high-flux dialyzers. Moreover, there was robust association and agreement between the two methods, confirmed by the Bland-Altman Analysis, which suggested that the values acquired by machine were within the limits of agreement, indicating acceptable accuracy of equipment.
The approach of measurement differed from that of the conventional method (weight evaluation was used instead of volumetric evaluation), the reprocessing machine could offer accurate results.
透析器再处理机器已取代人工来准备可重复使用的透析器。这也使得总细胞容积(TCV)测量过程变得更快。然而,与传统方法通过体积评估相比,关于机器重量评估对TCV功效的数据一直缺乏。本研究的目的是评估泰国MEDITOP公司生产的Kidney-Kleen再处理机器进行的TCV测量与传统方法的功效。
这项前瞻性队列研究于2014年9月至2015年12月进行。纳入低通量透析器(N = 101)和高通量透析器(N = 100)进行TCV评估。低通量透析器的重复使用次数最多为5次,高通量透析器为20次。采用Bland Altman分析来评估不同方法测量的值。
在低通量(0.81±0.20%)和高通量(1.32±0.39%)透析器中,通过重量评估(机器测量)得到的值高于传统方法体积评估得到的值。两种方法的TCV值相关性在低通量和高通量透析器中分别为r = 0.98,< 和r = 0.71,p < 0.001。此外,Bland Altman分析证实两种方法之间存在强关联和一致性,这表明机器获得的值在一致性范围内,表明设备准确性可接受。
测量方法与传统方法不同(使用重量评估而非体积评估),再处理机器可提供准确结果。