• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determination of adequate pelvic lymph node dissection range for Japanese males undergoing radical prostatectomy.确定接受根治性前列腺切除术的日本男性患者的足够盆腔淋巴结清扫范围。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 May;6(5):775-781. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1204. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
2
Eliminating microscopic lymph node metastasis by performing pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.在前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中通过进行盆腔淋巴结清扫来消除微小淋巴结转移。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;12(2):104-110. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1965. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
3
Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结转移发生率高。
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1681-6.
4
Topography of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended lymphadenectomy: results of a combined molecular and histopathologic mapping study.前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术和扩大淋巴结清扫术时淋巴结转移的分布:一项联合分子与组织病理学绘图研究的结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):222-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
5
Comparison of semi-extended and standard lymph node dissection in radical prostatectomy: A single-institute experience.根治性前列腺切除术中半扩大淋巴结清扫与标准淋巴结清扫的比较:单中心经验
Mol Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep;3(5):1085-1087. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.601. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
6
Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy?对于接受根治性前列腺切除术的日本男性,仅针对闭孔淋巴结进行有限的淋巴结清扫术是否是一种足够的手术方式?
Int J Urol. 2005 Aug;12(8):739-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01122.x.
7
Is pelvic lymph node dissection required at radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer?根治性前列腺切除术中对于低危前列腺癌是否需要进行盆腔淋巴结清扫?
Int J Urol. 2013 Nov;20(11):1092-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.12112. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
Reconsidering the role of pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in an era of improving radiological staging techniques.在放射影像学分期技术不断进步的时代,重新思考根治性前列腺切除术时行盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌中的作用。
World J Urol. 2018 Jan;36(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2119-0. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection including internal iliac packet should be performed during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.对于高危前列腺癌,在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术期间应进行包括髂内淋巴结组的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Oct;22(8):785-90. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0516. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy May Not Improve Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).盆腔淋巴结清扫术可能无法改善日本接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的前列腺癌患者的无生化复发生存率(MSUG94组)。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;14(23):5803. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235803.
2
A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时代伴有淋巴结转移的前列腺癌的列线图:日本的一项回顾性多中心队列研究(MSUG94组)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;12(10):2545. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102545.
3
Utility of Lymphadenectomy in Prostate Cancer: Where Do We Stand?淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌中的应用:我们目前的状况如何?
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 22;11(9):2343. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092343.
4
Eliminating microscopic lymph node metastasis by performing pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.在前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术中通过进行盆腔淋巴结清扫来消除微小淋巴结转移。
Mol Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;12(2):104-110. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1965. Epub 2019 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Total submission of pelvic lymphadenectomy tissues removed during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer increases lymph node yield and detection of micrometastases.根治性前列腺切除术时彻底提交前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结切除组织可增加淋巴结检出量和微转移灶的检出率。
Histopathology. 2014 Feb;64(3):399-404. doi: 10.1111/his.12262. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
2
Is pelvic lymph node dissection required at radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer?根治性前列腺切除术中对于低危前列腺癌是否需要进行盆腔淋巴结清扫?
Int J Urol. 2013 Nov;20(11):1092-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.12112. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
3
Should pelvic lymph node dissection be performed with radical prostatectomy? No.
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1284-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.053. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
4
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
5
The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer--therapeutic?盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌治疗中的作用——具有治疗作用吗?
J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.027.
6
Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.对耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术患者盆腔淋巴结清扫术中理想淋巴结产量进行批判性评估,以准确诊断前列腺癌淋巴结转移。
Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.008.
7
MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in prostate cancer management.磁共振成像和磁共振波谱在前列腺癌管理中的应用
Radiol Clin North Am. 2006 Sep;44(5):723-34, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2006.07.008.
8
Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.淋巴结清扫范围对前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后生存的影响。
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.055. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
9
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.2005年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Sep;29(9):1228-42. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1.
10
Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results.前列腺癌根治术后淋巴结阳性患者的预后:长期结果
J Urol. 2004 Dec;172(6 Pt 1):2252-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143448.04161.cc.

确定接受根治性前列腺切除术的日本男性患者的足够盆腔淋巴结清扫范围。

Determination of adequate pelvic lymph node dissection range for Japanese males undergoing radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Furubayashi Nobuki, Negishi Takahito, Iwai Hidenori, Nagase Kei, Taguchi Kenichi, Shimokawa Mototsugu, Nakamura Motonobu

机构信息

Department of Urology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

Department of Pathology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.

出版信息

Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 May;6(5):775-781. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1204. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

DOI:10.3892/mco.2017.1204
PMID:28515930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5431281/
Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the adequate pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) range for Japanese males undergoing radical prostatectomy. A total of 467 Japanese patients who underwent antegrade radical prostatectomy at the National Kyushu Cancer Center (Fukuoka, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the PLND extent: The standard (obturator + internal iliac nodes) group and the expanded (standard + additional nodes) group, which accounted for 64.5% (301/467) and 35.5% (166/467) of the patients, respectively. No differences were observed in the preoperative and postoperative characteristics of the two groups. In addition, there was no difference in PSA recurrence between the two groups. There were no differences between the standard and expanded groups in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (P=0.1456, P=0.1581, P=0.2125, respectively). The median number of lymph node dissection was 13 and 19, in the standard and expanded groups respectively (P<0.0001). However, regarding the number of lymph node metastases and the rate of patients with lymph node metastasis, no significant difference was observed between the standard and expanded groups (P=0.4219 and P=0.4257, respectively). According to multivariate analysis, a significant difference in the presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio 3.547; P=0.0247), but not in the PLND extent, was detected in patients with prostate specific antigen failure (P=0.0655). When expanding the dissection extent, the number of dissected lymph nodes increases, but is not associated with the number or rate of positive lymph nodes. Thus, the current dissection range is considered to be appropriate for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

摘要

本研究旨在确定接受根治性前列腺切除术的日本男性患者的合适盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)范围。对在日本九州国立癌症中心(福冈)接受顺行根治性前列腺切除术的467例日本患者进行了回顾性研究。根据PLND范围将患者分为两组:标准组(闭孔+髂内淋巴结)和扩大组(标准组+额外淋巴结),分别占患者的64.5%(301/467)和35.5%(166/467)。两组患者术前和术后特征无差异。此外,两组患者的PSA复发情况也无差异。低、中、高危组的标准组和扩大组之间均无差异(分别为P = 0.1456、P = 0.1581、P = 0.2125)。标准组和扩大组淋巴结清扫的中位数分别为13个和19个(P < 0.0001)。然而,关于淋巴结转移数量和淋巴结转移患者比例,标准组和扩大组之间未观察到显著差异(分别为P = 0.4219和P = 0.4257)。根据多变量分析,在前列腺特异性抗原失败的患者中,检测到淋巴结转移存在显著差异(风险比3.547;P = 0.0247),但在PLND范围方面无显著差异(P = 0.0655)。扩大清扫范围时,清扫的淋巴结数量增加,但与阳性淋巴结的数量或比例无关。因此,目前的清扫范围被认为适用于接受根治性前列腺切除术的日本男性。