Reble Carina, Gersonde Ingo, Schanzer Sabine, Meinke Martina C, Helfmann Jürgen, Lademann Jürgen
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Laser- und Medizin-Technologie Berlin GmbH, Berlin (LMTB), Fabeckstraße 60-62, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
J Biophotonics. 2018 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1002/jbio.201600257. Epub 2017 May 18.
Determination of sun protection factors (SPFs) is currently an invasive method, which is based on erythema formation (phototest). Here we describe an optical setup and measurement methodology for the determination of SPFs based on diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, which measures UV-reflectance spectra at 4 distances from the point of illumination. Due to a high spatial variation of the reflectance data, most likely due to inhomogeneities of the sunscreen distribution, data of 50 measurement positions are averaged. A dependence of the measured SPF on detection distance is significant for 3 sunscreens, while being inconclusive for 2 sunscreens due to high inter-sample variations. Using pig ear skin samples (n=6), the obtained SPF of 5 different commercial sunscreens corresponds to the SPF values of certified test institutes in 3 cases and is lower for 2 sunscreens of the same manufacturer, suggesting a formulation specific reason for the discrepancy. The results demonstrate that the measurement can be performed with a UV dose below the minimal erythema dose. We conclude the method may be considered as a potential noninvasive in vivo alternative to the invasive in vivo phototest, but further tests on different sunscreen formulations are still necessary.
目前,防晒系数(SPF)的测定是一种基于红斑形成(光测试)的侵入性方法。在此,我们描述了一种基于漫反射光谱法测定SPF的光学装置和测量方法,该方法在距照明点4个距离处测量紫外线反射光谱。由于反射率数据存在高度空间变化,很可能是由于防晒霜分布不均匀,因此对50个测量位置的数据进行了平均。对于3种防晒霜,测得的SPF对检测距离有显著依赖性,而对于2种防晒霜,由于样品间差异较大,结果尚无定论。使用猪耳皮肤样本(n = 6),5种不同商业防晒霜的测得SPF在3种情况下与认证测试机构的SPF值相符,而同一制造商的2种防晒霜的SPF值较低,这表明差异存在配方特定原因。结果表明,该测量可以在低于最小红斑剂量的紫外线剂量下进行。我们得出结论,该方法可被视为侵入性体内光测试的一种潜在非侵入性体内替代方法,但仍需对不同的防晒霜配方进行进一步测试。