• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二氧化碳与空气注入在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Baniya Ramkaji, Upadhaya Sunil, Khan Jahangir, Subedi Suresh K, Mohammed Tabrez S, Ganatra Balvant K, Bachuwa Ghassan

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center/Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2017 Sep;50(5):464-472. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.161. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.5946/ce.2016.161
PMID:28516756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5642065/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with air insufflation is commonly used for the staging and treatment of early gastric carcinoma. However, carbon dioxide (CO) use has been shown to cause less post-procedural pain and fewer adverse events. The objective of this study was to compare the post-procedural pain and adverse events associated with CO and air insufflation in ESD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the two approaches in ESD. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to analyze the data. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Four RCTs with a total of 391 patients who underwent ESD were included in our meta-analysis. The difference in maximal post-procedural pain between the two groups was statistically significant (MD, -7.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.6 - -1.21; =0.020). However, no significant differences were found in the length of procedure, end-tidal CO, rate of perforation, and postprocedural hemorrhage between the two groups. The incidence of overall adverse events was significantly lower in the CO group (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.32-0.84; =0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

CO insufflation in gastric ESD is associated with less post-operative pain and discomfort, and a lower risk of overall adverse events compared with air insufflation.

摘要

背景/目的:内镜下黏膜剥离术(ESD)联合空气注入常用于早期胃癌的分期和治疗。然而,已证明使用二氧化碳(CO₂)可减少术后疼痛和不良事件。本研究的目的是比较ESD中CO₂和空气注入相关的术后疼痛和不良事件。

方法

对比较ESD中两种方法的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统检索。采用Mantel-Haenszel方法分析数据。分别使用均值差(MD)和比值比(OR)分析连续变量和分类变量。

结果

四项RCT共纳入391例行ESD的患者,纳入我们的荟萃分析。两组术后最大疼痛差异有统计学意义(MD,-7.41;95%置信区间[CI],-13.6 - -1.21;P = 0.020)。然而,两组在手术时长、呼气末CO₂、穿孔率和术后出血方面未发现显著差异。CO₂组总体不良事件发生率显著较低(OR,0.51;CI,0.32 - 0.84;P = 0.007)。

结论

与空气注入相比,胃ESD中CO₂注入与术后疼痛和不适较少以及总体不良事件风险较低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/c4086b7ec9bc/ce-2016-161f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/fbb5cb68cbea/ce-2016-161f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/6650800cc2b6/ce-2016-161f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/91eec1d1674a/ce-2016-161f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/f386a5143428/ce-2016-161f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/b44ae68d62cb/ce-2016-161f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/a73b415a0dd2/ce-2016-161f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/c4086b7ec9bc/ce-2016-161f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/fbb5cb68cbea/ce-2016-161f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/6650800cc2b6/ce-2016-161f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/91eec1d1674a/ce-2016-161f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/f386a5143428/ce-2016-161f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/b44ae68d62cb/ce-2016-161f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/a73b415a0dd2/ce-2016-161f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ed/5642065/c4086b7ec9bc/ce-2016-161f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon Dioxide versus Air Insufflation in Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.二氧化碳与空气注入在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2017 Sep;50(5):464-472. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.161. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective study.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳注入的疗效:一项随机、双盲、对照、前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.043. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳充气的安全性和有效性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):8195-202. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8195.
4
CO2 insufflation versus air insufflation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳充气与空气充气的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0177909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177909. eCollection 2017.
5
Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation for Elective Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.择期结肠镜检查中二氧化碳与空气注入的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):102-16. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000243.
6
A pilot study to assess mediastinal emphysema after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection with carbon dioxide insufflation.一项评估二氧化碳充气食管内镜黏膜下剥离术后纵隔气肿的初步研究。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jun;44(6):565-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291664. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on the efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.一项关于二氧化碳充气在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(5):335-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326199. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
A prospective randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation compared with room air insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.一项比较二氧化碳气腹与空气气腹用于胃内镜黏膜下剥离术时安全性和有效性的前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;37(3):558-567. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15718. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.食管内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳注入可减少纵隔气肿:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 28;22(32):7373-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7373.
10
Effects of carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.二氧化碳注入在食管内镜黏膜下剥离术中的作用
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 May;59(115):734-7. doi: 10.5754/hge11547.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: How to be more efficient?内镜黏膜下剥离术:如何提高效率?
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1720-E1730. doi: 10.1055/a-1554-3884. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Effectiveness of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Healing of Ulcers after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.富自体血小板血浆在内镜下黏膜下剥离术后溃疡愈合中的有效性。
Clin Endosc. 2019 Sep;52(5):472-478. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.152. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Endoscopic perforation during EMR [corrected] or ESD: who should take care of the patient?

本文引用的文献

1
Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.食管内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳注入可减少纵隔气肿:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 28;22(32):7373-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7373.
2
The use of carbon dioxide in gastrointestinal endoscopy.二氧化碳在胃肠内镜检查中的应用。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.046. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Mar;6(3):E313-E314. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-101348. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
4
Carbon Dioxide Insufflation in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Is It an Urgent Need?内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳注入:这是迫切需求吗?
Clin Endosc. 2017 Sep;50(5):407-409. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.127. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳充气的安全性和有效性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 14;21(26):8195-202. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.8195.
4
Efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective study.胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中二氧化碳注入的疗效:一项随机、双盲、对照、前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1018-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.043. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with pulmonary dysfunction under conscious sedation.清醒镇静下肺功能不全患者行胃内镜黏膜下剥离术时二氧化碳充气的安全性
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3892-0. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
6
Carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with obstructive ventilatory disturbance.阻塞性通气障碍患者行结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术时的二氧化碳注入
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;29(3):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1806-6. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
7
A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses.对考科蓝图书馆数据的重新分析:荟萃分析中未观察到的异质性的危险。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069930. Print 2013.
8
Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a review and meta-analysis.二氧化碳气腹在经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中的应用:综述与荟萃分析。
Pancreas. 2013 Oct;42(7):1093-100. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182909da5.
9
PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.PRISMA for Abstracts:报告期刊和会议摘要中的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
10
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on the efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.一项关于二氧化碳充气在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术疗效的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(5):335-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326199. Epub 2013 Mar 6.