Evans J, Chen Q, Wuthrick E, Weldon M, Rong Y
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3839. doi: 10.1118/1.4735670.
Several planning strategies are available for hippocampal- avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) following RTOG protocol 0933, but have yet to be compared on a common set of patient data. In this inter-institutional investigation, we evaluate three modalities likely to be employed by protocol participants; step-and-shoot IMRT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy. A common set of patients is used for comparison, including credentialing and successfully accrued patients.
Eight patient datasets were selected and de-identified prior to planning. Structures were contoured by physicians per protocol using fused MRI datasets. Three plans were generated for each dataset: Philips Pinnacle 9-field non-coplanar IMRT using protocol recommended beam parameters, Varian's RapidArc using two coplanar arcs, and Accuray's TomoTherapy using a 1cm jaw width. With the goal of meeting the compliance criteria outlined in RTOG 0933 (target coverage and dose limits to the hippocampus and optic structures), three planners independently planned each modality without prior knowledge of the patient's other plans to reduce bias. The three plans for each patient were compared according to the protocol's dosimetric compliance criteria. A homogeneity index was also computed to compare target dose uniformity.
All plans achieved the protocol dose criteria, except for one RapidArc plan with slightly inferior dose to the optic chiasm. TomoTherapy offered superior dose homogeneity for all patients. For the two linac based methods, RapidArc was found to provide dose homogeneity at least as good as, and in most cases superior to, 9-field step-and-shoot IMRT.
Helical TomoTherapy offers superior dose homogeneity for HA-WBRT following RTOG 0933. Compared to step-and-shoot IMRT, volumetric modulated arc techniques, such as RapidArc, can offer improved homogeneity for HA- WBRT and are generally more efficient/expeditious to deliver than the noncoplanar 9-field arrangement recommended by the protocol, which uses 7 separate couch angles.
根据RTOG 0933协议,有几种计划策略可用于海马回避全脑放疗(HA-WBRT),但尚未在一组共同的患者数据上进行比较。在这项机构间研究中,我们评估了协议参与者可能采用的三种模式;静态调强放疗(IMRT)、容积调强弧形放疗和螺旋断层放疗。使用一组共同的患者进行比较,包括符合资质和成功入组的患者。
在计划前选择并去除八个患者数据集的标识信息。医生根据协议使用融合的MRI数据集勾勒结构。为每个数据集生成三个计划:使用协议推荐的射束参数的飞利浦Pinnacle 9野非共面IMRT、使用两个共面弧的瓦里安快速弧形放疗(RapidArc)以及使用1cm准直器宽度的Accuray螺旋断层放疗(TomoTherapy)。为了达到RTOG 0933中概述的符合标准(靶区覆盖以及海马和视神经结构的剂量限制),三位计划者独立规划每种模式,且事先不知道患者的其他计划,以减少偏差。根据协议的剂量学符合标准比较每个患者的三个计划。还计算了均匀性指数以比较靶区剂量均匀性。
除了一个RapidArc计划对视交叉的剂量略低外,所有计划均达到了协议剂量标准。TomoTherapy为所有患者提供了更好的剂量均匀性。对于两种基于直线加速器的方法,发现RapidArc提供的剂量均匀性至少与9野静态调强放疗一样好,并且在大多数情况下优于后者。
对于遵循RTOG 0933的HA-WBRT,螺旋断层放疗具有更好的剂量均匀性。与静态调强放疗相比,容积调强弧形技术,如RapidArc,可为HA-WBRT提供更好的均匀性,并且通常比协议推荐的使用7个不同治疗床角度的非共面9野布局更高效/快捷。