Yin Y, Liu T, Zhai D
Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan.
Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Jinan, Shandong.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3845. doi: 10.1118/1.4735694.
To compare the dosimetric benefits of Rapidarc (RA) combined with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) with those of other standard techniques, including free breathing (FB) during fixed-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and dual arc RA, in the treatment of patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC).
Ten patients with EC underwent computed tomography (CT) scans under 2 respiration conditions: free-breathing (FB) and DIBH. These scans were used to generate 3-dimensional conformal treatment plans. For breath-hold scans, the patients were brought to reproducible respiration levels using active breathing control (ABC) maneuvers. Planning target volumes (PTVs) for FB plans included a 0.5 cm margin for setup plus a 1 cm margin equal to the extent of tumor motion for respiration. PTVs for DIBH plans included a 0.5 cm margin for setup error and a 0.5 cm margin for residual uncertainty in tumor position. Using a dose level of 60 Gy to the PTV, three treatment plans were generated: IMRT-FB, RA-FB and RA-ABC, and the target and normal tissue volumes were compared, as were the dosimetry parameters.
On average, the DIBH technique resulted in increased lung volumes compared with FB techniques. There was no significant differences in gross tumor volume between the two breathing states (p > 0.05); but PTV and heart volume were larger for FB than for DIBH (p < 0.05). The overall CI and HI for the RA-ABC plan was slightly inferior to those of the IMRT- FB and RA-FB plans (p < 0.05 each). With DIBH, the heart was partly out of the beam portals and the average mean heart dose was reduced.
Compared with conventional FB, RA combined with DIBH significantly reduced cardiac and pulmonary doses without compromising the target coverage and may reduce treatment toxicity, enabling dose escalation in future prospective studies of patients with EC.
比较容积调强弧形治疗(RA)联合深吸气屏气(DIBH)与其他标准技术(包括在固定野调强放射治疗(IMRT)期间自由呼吸(FB)和双弧RA)在治疗胸段食管癌(EC)患者时的剂量学优势。
10例EC患者在两种呼吸条件下进行计算机断层扫描(CT):自由呼吸(FB)和DIBH。这些扫描用于生成三维适形治疗计划。对于屏气扫描,使用主动呼吸控制(ABC)操作使患者达到可重复的呼吸水平。FB计划的计划靶体积(PTV)包括0.5 cm的摆位边界加上1 cm的边界,该边界等于肿瘤呼吸运动的范围。DIBH计划的PTV包括0.5 cm的摆位误差边界和0.5 cm的肿瘤位置残余不确定性边界。使用60 Gy的PTV剂量水平,生成了三个治疗计划:IMRT-FB、RA-FB和RA-ABC,并比较了靶区和正常组织体积以及剂量学参数。
平均而言,与FB技术相比,DIBH技术导致肺体积增加。两种呼吸状态下的大体肿瘤体积无显著差异(p>0.05);但FB的PTV和心脏体积大于DIBH(p<0.05)。RA-ABC计划的总体适形指数(CI)和均匀性指数(HI)略低于IMRT-FB和RA-FB计划(各p<0.05)。采用DIBH时,心脏部分位于射野之外,平均心脏平均剂量降低。
与传统的FB相比,RA联合DIBH可显著降低心脏和肺部剂量,而不影响靶区覆盖,并且可能降低治疗毒性,从而在未来EC患者的前瞻性研究中实现剂量递增。