Ju S, Kim M, Hong C, Yim D, Kim J, Shin D, Lee S, Han Y, Shin J, Shin E, Ahn S, Choi D
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Electronics Engineering, Myongji University, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part14):3770-3771. doi: 10.1118/1.4735360.
A new system for manufacturing proton range compensator (PRC) was developed by using a three-dimensional printer (3DP). The physical accuracy and dosimetrical characteristics of the new PRC (PRC-3DP) was compared with conventional PRC (PRC-CMM) manufactured by computerized milling machine (CMM).
A PRC for brain cancer treatment, with passive scattered proton beam, was calculated in the TPS (Eclipse, Varian, USA) and its data was converted into a new format for 3DP (Projet HD3000, 3D Systems, USA), using the in-house developed software. PRC-3DP was printed with UV curable acrylic plastic, while PRC- CMM was milled into PMMA using a CMM (V-CNC500, CINCINNATI, USA). We measured the 5 randomly selected points for its physical thickness of both PRCs to evaluate its physical accuracy. Stopping power ratio (SPR), spread-out bragg peak (SOBP, 90∼90%) and distal fall-off (DFO, 20∼80%) at the central axis, +2.5, and 2.5 cm in the lateral direction, and FWHM of dose profile in depth 6, 8, and 10 cm were measured to evaluate for its dosimetrical characteristics. All measured data was compared with TPS data.
There was no significant difference in the physical depths between the calculated and the measured value of both RPC-3DP and RPC-CMM (p<0.05). SPR of both PRC showed similarity in value (1.022) when compared with that of the water. Average difference of SOBP between the TPS and the measured data from both PRC was 0.3773±0.0075 and 0.2762±0.0235 cm, while DFO was 0.06±0.005 and 0.0471±0.0042 cm, respectively. Average differences of FWHM between the TPS and the measured data from PRC-3DP and PRC-CMM were 0.1799±0.025 and 0.137±0.0181 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in dosimetrical characteristic between the RTP and both PRCs (p<0.05).
Physical accuracy and dosimetrical characteristics of the PRC-3DP were comparable to that of the conventional PRC-CMM, while significant system minimization was provided. This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program, 10040362, Development of an integrated management solution for radiation therapy funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE, Korea). This idea was applied for a Korea patent (no. 10-2012-0010812).
利用三维打印机(3DP)开发一种制造质子射程补偿器(PRC)的新系统。将新型PRC(PRC - 3DP)的物理精度和剂量学特性与由计算机控制铣床(CMM)制造的传统PRC(PRC - CMM)进行比较。
在治疗计划系统(TPS,美国瓦里安公司的Eclipse)中计算用于脑癌治疗的带有被动散射质子束的PRC,并使用自行开发的软件将其数据转换为适用于3DP(美国3D Systems公司的Projet HD3000)的新格式。PRC - 3DP用紫外线可固化丙烯酸塑料打印,而PRC - CMM则使用CMM(美国辛辛那提公司的V - CNC500)铣削成聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯。我们随机选取5个点测量两种PRC 的物理厚度,以评估其物理精度。测量中心轴、横向 +2.5 和 -2.5 cm处的阻止本领比(SPR)、扩展布拉格峰(SOBP,90∼90%)和远端剂量下降(DFO,20∼80%),以及深度6、8和10 cm处剂量分布的半高宽(FWHM),以评估其剂量学特性。所有测量数据均与TPS数据进行比较。
RPC - 3DP和RPC - CMM的计算值与测量值之间的物理深度无显著差异(p<0.05)。与水相比,两种PRC的SPR值相似(1.022)。TPS与两种PRC测量数据之间SOBP的平均差异分别为0.3773±0.0075和0.2762±0.0235 cm,而DFO分别为0.06±0.005和0.0471±0.0042 cm。TPS与PRC - 3DP和PRC - CMM测量数据之间FWHM的平均差异分别为0.1799±0.025和0.137±0.