Peng Y
Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part3):3610. doi: 10.1118/1.4734655.
Purpose To evaluate the effects of the couch, the immobilization/support devices, and air gap on the skin dose for SBRT treatment with abdominal compression device and to investigate strategies to minimize skin dose by phantom measurementMaterial and methodsSkin-sparing comes from lower dose in buildup region, anything added between tissue and air may change buildup PDD curve hence skin dose increases. To investigate such effects due to different buildup materials and air gap between the buildup material and the surface, we employed EBT2 film in slab and water phantoms to measure doses at depths varying from surface to dmax, field sizes (4×4 to 10×10 cm ), and air gaps from 5 to 15 cm for 6 MV photons. Measured dose was normalized to dose at dmax for a 10×10 cm field. The buildup materials included table tops (tennis net, Exact Couch and Indexed Immobilization table tops), vacuum bags (Civco Vac-Lok and Med-Tec cushions), and body frames (Elekta stereotactic body frame and Civco Body Pro-Loc). ResultsThe relative doses at depth of 1.00 mm were 0.63 with no buildup, 0.90 with couch+6cm bag, 0.91 with bodyframe+bag, and 0.96 with couch+bodyframe+bag for a 4×4 cm field. With a 10×10 cm field, the above values changed to 0.67, 0.94, 1.01, and 0.97, respectively. Thick bag (6.0cm) increased skin dose by 10% comparing to the thinner bag (1.5cm). For a buildup (couch + body frame) plus air gap, the relative doses were 0.73, 0.84, and 0.91 for air gap of 15.0, 10.0, and 5.0 cm, respectively, for a 10×10 cm field.
The skin dose increases by up to 40% if patient was treated through the immobilization device or couch. Skin dose also increased with increasing field size. Introduction of large air gap may recover much of the lost buildup effect.
目的 评估治疗床、固定/支撑装置和气隙对使用腹部压迫装置的立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)治疗皮肤剂量的影响,并通过模体测量研究使皮肤剂量最小化的策略。
皮肤剂量降低源于建成区较低的剂量,组织与空气之间添加的任何物质都可能改变建成区的百分深度剂量(PDD)曲线,从而使皮肤剂量增加。为研究不同建成材料以及建成材料与体表之间气隙产生的此类影响,我们使用EBT2胶片在平板模体和水模体中测量从体表到最大剂量深度(dmax)不同深度处、射野尺寸(4×4至10×10厘米)以及6兆伏光子下气隙为5至15厘米时的剂量。将测量剂量归一化为10×10厘米射野在dmax处的剂量。建成材料包括治疗床台面(网球网、精确治疗床和索引固定治疗床台面)、真空袋(Civco Vac-Lok和Med-Tec垫子)以及体架(医科达立体定向体架和Civco Body Pro-Loc)。结果:对于4×4厘米射野,在1.00毫米深度处的相对剂量,无建成材料时为0.63,治疗床 + 6厘米袋子时为0.90,体架 + 袋子时为0.91,治疗床 + 体架 + 袋子时为0.96。对于10×10厘米射野,上述数值分别变为0.67、0.94、1.01和0.97。厚袋子(6.0厘米)与薄袋子(1.5厘米)相比使皮肤剂量增加了10%。对于建成区(治疗床 + 体架)加一个气隙,对于10×10厘米射野,气隙为15.0、10.0和5.0厘米时的相对剂量分别为0.73、0.84和0.91。
如果通过固定装置或治疗床对患者进行治疗,皮肤剂量会增加高达40%。皮肤剂量也随射野尺寸增大而增加。引入较大气隙可能会恢复大部分损失的建成效应。