Suppr超能文献

SU-E-J-60:仰卧位和俯卧位患者盆腔放射治疗图像引导中CT在线系统与三维表面成像系统的比较

SU-E-J-60: Comparison of CT-On-Rails and a 3D Surface Imaging System for Image Guided Pelvic Radiation Therapy for Both Supine and Prone Patient Positions.

作者信息

Zhao H, Wang B, Rassiah-Szegedi P, Sarkar V, Huang Y, Szegedi M, Gonzalez V, Salter B

机构信息

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part6):3666. doi: 10.1118/1.4734895.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigate the feasibility of using AlignRT for pelvic radiation image guidance. The uniqueness of our study is that all patients have multiple CT-on-rails (CTOR) scans to compare corresponding AlignRT images to.

METHODS

Ten patients receiving pelvic radiation were enrolled in this study. Two simulation CT scans were performed in supine and prone positions for each patient. Body surface contours were generated in treatment planning system and exported to AlignRT to serve as reference images. The patient was aligned to treatment isocenter with room lasers, and then scanned with both CTOR and AlignRT in both supine and prone positions. Image guidance shifts were calculated for both modalities by comparison to the simulation CT and the differences between them were analyzed. These procedures were performed for each patient once per week for five weeks. The average and maximum difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR were calculated for each patient.

RESULTS

For supine position, there are 4 patients who had the average difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR along any direction (vertical, longitudinal, and lateral) greater than 0.5cm, and 1 patient greater than 1cm. For prone position, there are 7 patients who had the average difference greater than 0.5cm, and 3 patients greater than 1cm. For supine position, there are 4 patients who had the maximum difference great than 1cm. For prone position, there are 9 patients who had the maximum difference greater than 1 cm. The difference of displacement between AlignRT and CTOR is greater for prone position than for supine position.

CONCLUSIONS

AlignRT does not appear to be an advisable image guidance approach for pelvic radiation therapy for patients with either supine or prone position. There appears to be a potential for large alignment discrepancies (up to 2.25 cm) between AlignRT and CTOR.

摘要

目的

我们研究使用AlignRT进行盆腔放射图像引导的可行性。我们这项研究的独特之处在于,所有患者都有多张在线CT(CTOR)扫描图像,以便与相应的AlignRT图像进行比较。

方法

本研究纳入了10例接受盆腔放疗的患者。为每位患者在仰卧位和俯卧位各进行了两次模拟CT扫描。在治疗计划系统中生成体表轮廓,并导出到AlignRT以用作参考图像。患者通过室内激光与治疗等中心对齐,然后在仰卧位和俯卧位分别用CTOR和AlignRT进行扫描。通过与模拟CT比较,计算两种方式的图像引导位移,并分析它们之间的差异。这些操作每周为每位患者进行一次,共进行五周。计算每位患者AlignRT和CTOR之间位移的平均差异和最大差异。

结果

在仰卧位,有4例患者AlignRT和CTOR在任何方向(垂直、纵向和横向)的位移平均差异大于0.5cm,1例患者大于1cm。在俯卧位,有7例患者平均差异大于0.5cm,3例患者大于1cm。在仰卧位,有4例患者最大差异大于1cm。在俯卧位,有9例患者最大差异大于1cm。AlignRT和CTOR之间的位移差异在俯卧位大于仰卧位。

结论

对于仰卧位或俯卧位的患者,AlignRT似乎不是盆腔放射治疗中一种可取的图像引导方法。AlignRT和CTOR之间似乎存在较大的对准差异(高达2.25cm)的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验