Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放手术治疗胰体尾非导管腺癌性胰腺肿瘤(NDACPT)的系统评价与荟萃分析

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy of Nonductal Adenocarcinomatous Pancreatic Tumor (NDACPT) in the Pancreatic Body and Tail.

作者信息

Yi Xiaojiang, Chen Sile, Wang Wei, Zou Liaonan, Diao Dechang, Zheng Yansheng, He Yaobin, Li Hongming, Luo Lijie, Xiong Wenjun, Wan Jin

机构信息

*Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine †Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):206-219. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000416.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is regarded as a safe and effective surgical approach for lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. This review examined the evidence from published data of comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor in pancreatic body and tail.

METHODS

A systematic review of the studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy was conducted. Comparative studies published between January 1996 and June 2016 were included. Studies were selected on the basis of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. These 2 techniques were compared regarding several outcomes of interest, which were divided into preoperative, operative, postoperative, and pathologic characteristics, postoperative biomarker, and hospital stay cost. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis partially confirmed the robustness of these data.

RESULTS

Ten comparative case-control studies involving 712 patients (53.7% laparoscopic and 46.3% open), who underwent a distal pancreatectomy were included. The results favored laparoscopy with regard to intraoperative blood loss (P=0.0001), the rate of blood transfusion (P=0.02), total hospital stay (P=0.004), postoperative hospital stay (P<0.0001), overall morbidity (P=0.0002), the rate of wound infection (P=0.05), time to initial feeds (P<0.0001), first flatus time (P=0.008), duration of pain-killer intake (P=0.0003), and C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 (P=<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, excluding western country studies, operation time changed to have a statistically significant difference between these 2 groups (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection results in improved operative and postoperative outcomes compared with open surgery according to the results of the present meta-analysis. It may be a safe and feasible option for nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor patients in pancreatic body and tail. However, randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to confirm the relevance of these findings.

摘要

背景

目前,腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术被认为是治疗胰腺体尾部病变的一种安全有效的手术方法。本综述研究了已发表数据中关于腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺体尾部非导管腺癌性胰腺肿瘤的比较研究证据。

方法

对比较腹腔镜和开放远端胰腺切除术的研究进行系统综述。纳入1996年1月至2016年6月发表的比较研究。根据特定的纳入和排除标准选择研究。比较这两种技术在几个感兴趣的结果方面的差异,这些结果分为术前、术中、术后和病理特征、术后生物标志物以及住院费用。敏感性和亚组分析部分证实了这些数据的稳健性。

结果

纳入了10项比较病例对照研究,共712例患者(53.7%为腹腔镜手术,46.3%为开放手术)接受了远端胰腺切除术。结果显示,在术中失血(P=0.0001)、输血率(P=0.02)、总住院时间(P=0.004)、术后住院时间(P<0.0001)、总体并发症发生率(P=0.0002)、伤口感染率(P=0.05)、开始进食时间(P<0.0001)、首次排气时间(P=0.008)、止痛药服用持续时间(P=0.0003)以及术后第1天的C反应蛋白(P<0.0001)方面,腹腔镜手术更具优势。在亚组分析中,排除西方国家的研究后,两组之间的手术时间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.02)。

结论

根据本荟萃分析的结果,与开放手术相比,腹腔镜切除术可改善手术和术后结果。对于胰腺体尾部非导管腺癌性胰腺肿瘤患者,这可能是一种安全可行的选择。然而,应进行随机对照试验以证实这些发现的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验