• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于以色列人群的真实世界数据应用 FRAX 进行骨折风险评估。

Fracture Risk Assessment With FRAX Using Real-World Data in a Population-Based Cohort From Israel.

机构信息

Department of Health Systems Administration, Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Institute for Health Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 1;187(1):94-102. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx128.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwx128
PMID:28520844
Abstract

The predictive value of the World Health Organization's Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) was evaluated using real-world community data. A population-based cohort of 141,320 women aged 50-90 years (median age, 58 years; interquartile range, 54-67) in 2004 was extracted from the central database of a large Israeli health-care services provider and insurer. Retrospective FRAX scores were calculated using computerized health records and compared with actual incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) during the following 10 years. Fracture proportions of 6.9% for MOFs and 2.2% for hip fractures were expected, as opposed to 13.5% and 2.9% observed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of FRAX scores calculated without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD) data was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.66) for MOF and 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.82) for hip fracture. A total of 16,578 subjects had BMD data at the index date, and their risk estimates based solely on BMD exhibited lower predictive performance for both MOFs (AUC = 0.62 vs. 0.65; P = 0.003) and hip fractures (AUC = 0.78 vs. 0.84; P < 0.001) as compared with FRAX. FRAX scores based on electronic health records provided reasonable discrimination despite some underestimation of the absolute risk of nonhip fractures. Integration of FRAX with routine clinical systems could increase implementation in daily practice and improve risk detection, especially for patients without BMD data.

摘要

世界卫生组织的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)的预测价值是使用真实世界的社区数据进行评估的。从一家大型以色列医疗保健服务提供商和保险公司的中央数据库中提取了 2004 年年龄在 50-90 岁(中位数年龄 58 岁;四分位间距 54-67)的 141320 名女性的基于人群的队列。使用计算机化的健康记录计算回顾性 FRAX 评分,并将其与接下来 10 年内主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)的实际发生率进行比较。预计 MOF 的骨折比例为 6.9%,髋部骨折为 2.2%,而观察到的比例分别为 13.5%和 2.9%。不包括骨密度(BMD)数据计算的 FRAX 评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 MOF 的 0.65(95%置信区间:0.65,0.66),髋部骨折的 0.82(95%置信区间:0.81,0.82)。共有 16578 名患者在指数日期有 BMD 数据,仅基于 BMD 的风险估计对 MOF(AUC=0.62 比 0.65;P=0.003)和髋部骨折(AUC=0.78 比 0.84;P<0.001)的预测性能均较低。尽管对非髋部骨折的绝对风险存在一定低估,但基于电子健康记录的 FRAX 评分仍提供了合理的区分度。将 FRAX 与常规临床系统相结合,可以增加在日常实践中的实施,并提高风险检测能力,特别是对于没有 BMD 数据的患者。

相似文献

1
Fracture Risk Assessment With FRAX Using Real-World Data in a Population-Based Cohort From Israel.基于以色列人群的真实世界数据应用 FRAX 进行骨折风险评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 1;187(1):94-102. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx128.
2
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.利用基于人群的电子健康记录数据对三种骨质疏松性骨折风险预测工具进行外部验证和比较:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 19;356:i6755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6755.
3
Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.西班牙FRAX模型在预测骨质疏松性骨折决策中的原理:西班牙女性FRIDEX队列的更新
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 17;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6.
4
Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.肌少症合并 FRAX 概率可提高中国老年男性骨折风险预测。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
5
How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.FRAX(澳大利亚)和 Garvan 计算器预测骨折事件的效果如何?来自 Geelong 骨质疏松症研究的数据。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Oct;30(10):2129-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05088-2. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
6
Prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures in Australian men using FRAX scores adjusted with trabecular bone score.基于骨小梁评分调整的 FRAX 评分对澳大利亚男性主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折的预测。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Jan;29(1):101-108. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4226-6. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
7
Administrative healthcare data applied to fracture risk assessment.行政医疗保健数据应用于骨折风险评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):565-571. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4780-6. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
8
Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.FRAX 验证及自我报告的老年人跌倒对一般人群的影响:挪威 HUNT 研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2935-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
9
Gait speed and one-leg standing time each add to the predictive ability of FRAX.步速和单腿站立时间均增强了FRAX工具的预测能力。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3818-x. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Fracture risk prediction using FRAX®: a 10-year follow-up survey of the Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.FRAX® 预测骨折风险:日本基于人群的骨质疏松症(JPOS)队列研究的 10 年随访调查。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Dec;22(12):3037-45. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1537-x. Epub 2011 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Hip Axis Length and Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle as Risk Factors for Proximal Femur Fractures in Octogenarians to Centenarians.髋轴长度和股骨颈干角作为八旬老人至百岁老人股骨近端骨折的危险因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 12;13(14):4071. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144071.
2
Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.种族特异性 FRAX 模型基于证据且支持公平护理:对 ASBMR 工作组关于骨折风险的临床算法报告的回应。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Sep;35(9):1487-1496. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07162-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
3
A plasma protein-based risk score to predict hip fractures.
基于血浆蛋白的风险评分预测髋部骨折。
Nat Aging. 2024 Aug;4(8):1064-1075. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00639-7. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
An overview of the use of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in osteoporosis.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)在骨质疏松症中的应用概述。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Mar;47(3):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02219-9. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.执行摘要:意大利 2021 年脆性骨折的诊断、风险分层和护理连续性指南。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1137671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671. eCollection 2023.
6
A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS.一项关于骨折风险评估工具(FRAX、DeFRA、FRA-HS)性能的系统评价。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2023 Nov;46(11):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
7
Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.40 岁及以上成年人在初级保健中进行脆性骨折一级预防的筛查:筛查和治疗效果及可接受性以及风险预测工具准确性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 21;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.
8
Cross-sectional osteoporotic risk prediction with the FRAX without BMD in male and female patients attending OPD in a community health center of Bihar.在比哈尔邦一家社区卫生中心门诊就诊的男性和女性患者中,使用无骨密度的FRAX进行骨质疏松症风险的横断面预测。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Jun;11(6):2345-2350. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1165_21. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
9
Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.骨折风险预测工具FRAX的更新:对潜在队列的系统评价及分析计划
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2103-2136. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06435-6. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Detecting pathological features and predicting fracture risk from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using deep learning.使用深度学习从双能X线吸收测定图像中检测病理特征并预测骨折风险。
Bone Rep. 2021 Apr 24;14:101070. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101070. eCollection 2021 Jun.