• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FRAX 验证及自我报告的老年人跌倒对一般人群的影响:挪威 HUNT 研究。

Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Rheumatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2935-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9
PMID:28668994
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) for hip fracture prediction was validated in a Norwegian population 50-90 years. Fracture risk increased with higher FRAX score, and the observed number of hip fractures agreed well with the predicted number, except for the youngest and oldest men. Self-reported fall was an independent risk factor for fracture in women.

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim was to validate FRAX without BMD for hip fracture prediction in a Norwegian population of men and women 50-90 years. Secondary, to study whether information of falls could improve prediction of fractures in the subgroup aged 70-90 years.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the third survey of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3), the fracture registry in Nord-Trøndelag, and the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), including 15,432 women and 13,585 men. FRAX hip without BMD was calculated, and hip fractures were registered for a median follow-up of 5.2 years. The number of estimated and observed fractures was assessed, ROC curves with area under the curve (AUC), and Cox regression analyses. For the group aged 70-90 years, self-reported falls the last year before HUNT3 were included in the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The risk of fracture increased with higher FRAX score. When FRAX groups were categorized in a 10-year percentage risk for hip fracture as follows, <4, 4-7.9, 8-11.9, and ≥12%, the hazard ratio (HR) for hip fracture between the lowest and the highest group was 17.80 (95% CI: 12.86-24.65) among women and 23.40 (13.93-39.30) in men. Observed number of hip fractures agreed quite well with the predicted number, except for the youngest and oldest men. AUC was 0.81 (0.78-0.83) for women and 0.79 (0.76-0.83) for men. Self-reported fall was an independent risk factor for fracture in women (HR 1.64, 1.20-2.24), and among men, this was not significant (1.09, 0.65-1.83).

CONCLUSIONS

FRAX without BMD predicted hip fracture reasonably well. In the age group 70-90 years, falls seemed to imply an additional risk among women.

摘要

目的

在挪威 50-90 岁的男性和女性人群中验证不基于骨密度(BMD)的骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)对髋部骨折的预测作用。次要目的:研究在 70-90 岁年龄组中,跌倒信息是否能改善骨折预测。

方法

数据来自挪威特伦德拉格健康研究(HUNT3)的第三次调查、特伦德拉格骨折登记处和挪威处方数据库(NorPD),包括 15432 名女性和 13585 名男性。计算不基于 BMD 的 FRAX 髋部骨折,并对中位随访 5.2 年期间的髋部骨折进行登记。评估估计和观察到的骨折数量、曲线下面积(AUC)的 ROC 曲线以及 Cox 回归分析。对于年龄在 70-90 岁的组,将 HUNT3 前一年的自我报告跌倒纳入 Cox 回归模型。

结果

骨折风险随 FRAX 评分的升高而增加。当 FRAX 组按 10 年髋部骨折百分比风险分为<4、4-7.9、8-11.9 和≥12%时,女性最低组和最高组之间髋部骨折的风险比(HR)为 17.80(95%CI:12.86-24.65),男性为 23.40(13.93-39.30)。观察到的髋部骨折数量与预测数量相当吻合,除了最年轻和最年长的男性。女性的 AUC 为 0.81(0.78-0.83),男性为 0.79(0.76-0.83)。自我报告的跌倒是女性骨折的独立危险因素(HR 1.64,1.20-2.24),而在男性中,这并不显著(1.09,0.65-1.83)。

结论

不基于 BMD 的 FRAX 能较好地预测髋部骨折。在 70-90 岁年龄组中,跌倒似乎是女性骨折的一个额外危险因素。

相似文献

1
Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway.FRAX 验证及自我报告的老年人跌倒对一般人群的影响:挪威 HUNT 研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2935-2944. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
2
The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong.先前跌倒在与 FRAX 联合用于预测中国老年男女主要骨质疏松性骨折中的作用:来自香港 Mr. OS 和 Ms. OS 队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Feb;29(2):355-363. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4277-8. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry.FRAX 在临床实践中的表现根据性别和骨质疏松症定义:马尼托巴省 BMD 登记处。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4415-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.肌少症合并 FRAX 概率可提高中国老年男性骨折风险预测。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
5
Anti-osteoporosis drug use: too little, too much, or just right? The HUNT study, Norway.抗骨质疏松药物的使用:太少、太多,还是刚刚好?挪威 HUNT 研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1875-1885. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4560-3. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.FRAX(澳大利亚)和 Garvan 计算器预测骨折事件的效果如何?来自 Geelong 骨质疏松症研究的数据。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Oct;30(10):2129-2139. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05088-2. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Gait speed and one-leg standing time each add to the predictive ability of FRAX.步速和单腿站立时间均增强了FRAX工具的预测能力。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3818-x. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
8
Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.基于 DXA 的有限元分析的骨折风险指数可独立于 FRAX 预测骨折事件:曼尼托巴 BMD 登记处。
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
9
FRAX for fracture prediction shorter and longer than 10 years: the Manitoba BMD registry.FRAX 用于预测 10 年以上和 10 年以下骨折风险:曼尼托巴省骨密度登记处。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Sep;28(9):2557-2564. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4091-3. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
10
Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.基于注册的队列研究:从常规临床实践中的自我报告跌倒预测骨折。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Nov;30(11):2195-2203. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05106-3. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospitalisation from fractures in New Zealand octogenarians: LiLACS NZ.新西兰八旬老人骨折住院情况:LiLACS NZ研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Apr 9;20(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01528-1.
2
Assessing and managing bone health and fracture risk in Parkinson's disease: the BONE PARK 2 protocol.评估与管理帕金森病患者的骨骼健康和骨折风险:BONE PARK 2方案
Age Ageing. 2025 Mar 3;54(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf052.
3
Race-specific FRAX models are evidence-based and support equitable care: a response to the ASBMR Task Force report on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.

本文引用的文献

1
FRAX updates 2016.FRAX 2016年更新版
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;28(4):433-41. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000304.
2
Rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2023-2038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8. Epub 2016 May 3.
3
A combination of clinical balance measures and FRAX® to improve identification of high-risk fallers.结合临床平衡测量与FRAX®以改善对高危跌倒者的识别。
种族特异性 FRAX 模型基于证据且支持公平护理:对 ASBMR 工作组关于骨折风险的临床算法报告的回应。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Sep;35(9):1487-1496. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07162-w. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
A plasma protein-based risk score to predict hip fractures.基于血浆蛋白的风险评分预测髋部骨折。
Nat Aging. 2024 Aug;4(8):1064-1075. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00639-7. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
Guidelines for fracture risk assessment and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50 in Qatar.《卡塔尔绝经后妇女和 50 岁以上男性骨质疏松骨折风险评估和管理指南》。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 May 2;19(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01389-0.
6
Osteoporosis and cement usage in total hip arthroplasty.骨质疏松症与全髋关节置换术中的骨水泥使用。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1649-1655. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03855-4. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
7
A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies.一项对队列研究中既往跌倒与后续骨折风险的荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):469-494. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-07012-1. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
8
An overview of the use of the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in osteoporosis.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)在骨质疏松症中的应用概述。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Mar;47(3):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02219-9. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
9
Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.执行摘要:意大利 2021 年脆性骨折的诊断、风险分层和护理连续性指南。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 18;14:1137671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671. eCollection 2023.
10
A systematic review on the performance of fracture risk assessment tools: FRAX, DeFRA, FRA-HS.一项关于骨折风险评估工具(FRAX、DeFRA、FRA-HS)性能的系统评价。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2023 Nov;46(11):2287-2297. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02082-8. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 3;16:94. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0266-6.
4
Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study.挪威髋部骨折发病率持续下降:一项挪威骨质疏松症注册研究(NOREPOS研究)
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jul;27(7):2217-2222. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3516-8. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
5
Forearm fractures in Central Norway, 1999-2012: incidence, time trends, and seasonal variation.1999 - 2012年挪威中部的前臂骨折:发病率、时间趋势和季节变化
Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11:7. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0257-4. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
6
FRAX and fracture prediction without bone mineral density.FRAX与不依赖骨密度的骨折预测
Climacteric. 2015;18 Suppl 2:2-9. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1092342. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
FRAX predicts incident falls in elderly men: findings from MrOs Sweden.FRAX预测老年男性的跌倒发生率:瑞典MrOs研究的结果
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3295-7. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Use of anti-osteoporotic drugs in central Norway after a forearm fracture.挪威中部前臂骨折后抗骨质疏松药物的使用情况。
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:235. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0235-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.骨质疏松性骨折风险预测工具的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Nov;74(11):1958-67. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207907. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.亚临床甲状腺功能障碍与骨折风险:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2015 May 26;313(20):2055-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5161.