Werumeus Buning Jorien, Touw Daan J, Brummelman Pauline, Dullaart Robin P F, van den Berg Gerrit, van der Klauw Melanie M, Kamp Jasper, Wolffenbuttel Bruce H R, van Beek André P
Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Metabolism. 2017 Jun;71:7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
This study aimed at comparing pharmacokinetics of two different doses of hydrocortisone (HC) in patients with secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI).
DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Forty-six patients with SAI participated in this randomized double-blind crossover study.
Patients received two different doses of HC (0.2-0.3mg HC/kg body weight/day and 0.4-0.6mg HC/kg body weight/day).
One- and two-compartment population models for plasma free cortisol, plasma total cortisol and salivary cortisol were parameterized. The individual pharmacokinetic parameters clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), elimination half-life (t), maximum concentration (C), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.
The one-compartment models gave a better description of the data compared to the two-compartment models. Weight-adjusted dosing reduced variability in cortisol exposure with comparable AUCs between weight groups. However, there was large inter-individual variation in CL and V of plasma free cortisol, plasma total cortisol and salivary cortisol. As a consequence, AUC varied more than 10 fold. Cortisol exposure was increased with the higher dose, but this was dose proportional only for free cortisol concentrations and not for total cortisol.
Cortisol concentrations after a doubling of the dose were only dose proportional for free cortisol. HC pharmacokinetics can differ up to 10-fold inter-individually and individual adjustment of treatment doses may be necessary. Doubling of the HC dose in fast metabolizers (patients that showed relative low AUC and thus high clearance compared to other patients), does not result in significantly enhanced exposure during large parts of the day and these patients may need other management strategies.
本研究旨在比较两种不同剂量氢化可的松(HC)在继发性肾上腺皮质功能不全(SAI)患者中的药代动力学。
设计、地点与患者:46例SAI患者参与了这项随机双盲交叉研究。
患者接受两种不同剂量的HC(0.2 - 0.3mg HC/千克体重/天和0.4 - 0.6mg HC/千克体重/天)。
对血浆游离皮质醇、血浆总皮质醇和唾液皮质醇的一室和二室群体模型进行参数化。计算个体药代动力学参数清除率(CL)、分布容积(V)、消除半衰期(t)、最大浓度(C)和曲线下面积(AUC)。
与二室模型相比,一室模型对数据的描述更佳。体重调整给药降低了皮质醇暴露的变异性,各体重组间AUC相当。然而,血浆游离皮质醇、血浆总皮质醇和唾液皮质醇的CL和V存在较大个体间差异。因此,AUC变化超过10倍。较高剂量时皮质醇暴露增加,但仅游离皮质醇浓度呈剂量正比关系,总皮质醇并非如此。
剂量加倍后皮质醇浓度仅游离皮质醇呈剂量正比关系。HC药代动力学个体间差异可达10倍,可能需要个体化调整治疗剂量。快速代谢者(与其他患者相比AUC相对较低、清除率较高的患者)HC剂量加倍,在一天中的大部分时间内暴露量并未显著增加,这些患者可能需要其他管理策略。