Stam Suzanne P, Vulto Annet, Vos Michel J, Kerstens Michiel N, Rutgers Abraham, Kema Ido, Touw Daan J, Bakker Stephan Jl, van Beek André P
Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 26;12(4):e061678. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061678.
Corticosteroids are an important pillar in many anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive treatment regimens and are available in natural and synthetic forms, which are considered equipotent if clinical bioequivalence data are used. Current clinical bioequivalence data are however based on animal studies or studies with subjective endpoints. Furthermore, advancement in steroid physiology with regard to metabolism, intracellular handling and receptor activation have not yet been incorporated. Therefore, this study aims to re-examine the clinical bioequivalence and dose effects of the most widely used synthetic corticosteroids, prednisolone and dexamethasone.
In this double-blind, randomised cross-over clinical trial, 24 healthy male and female volunteers aged 18-75 years, will be included. All volunteers will randomly receive either first a daily dose of 7.5 mg prednisolone for 1 week, immediately followed by a daily dose of 30 mg prednisolone for 1 week, or first a presumed clinical bioequivalent dose of 1.125 mg dexamethasone per day, immediately followed by 4.5 mg of dexamethasone per day for 1 week. After a wash-out period of 4-8 weeks, the other treatment will be applied. The primary study endpoint is the difference in free cortisol excretion in 24 hours urine. Secondary endpoints will include differences in immunological parameters, blood pressure and metabolic measurements.
This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METC 2020.398). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.
ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04733144), and in the Dutch trial registry (NL9138).
皮质类固醇是许多抗炎和免疫抑制治疗方案的重要支柱,有天然和合成两种形式,如果使用临床生物等效性数据,它们被认为具有同等效力。然而,目前的临床生物等效性数据是基于动物研究或具有主观终点的研究。此外,在类固醇生理学方面,关于代谢、细胞内处理和受体激活的进展尚未纳入考虑。因此,本研究旨在重新审视最广泛使用的合成皮质类固醇泼尼松龙和地塞米松的临床生物等效性和剂量效应。
在这项双盲、随机交叉临床试验中,将纳入24名年龄在18至75岁之间的健康男性和女性志愿者。所有志愿者将随机先接受每日7.5毫克泼尼松龙的剂量,持续1周,随后立即接受每日30毫克泼尼松龙的剂量,持续1周;或者先接受每日1.125毫克地塞米松的假定临床生物等效剂量,随后立即接受每日4.5毫克地塞米松的剂量,持续1周。在4至8周的洗脱期后,将应用另一种治疗。主要研究终点是24小时尿液中游离皮质醇排泄量的差异。次要终点将包括免疫参数、血压和代谢测量的差异。
本研究已获得格罗宁根大学医学中心医学伦理委员会(METC 2020.398)的批准。本研究结果将提交至同行评审期刊发表。
ClinicalTrials.gov(标识符:NCT04733144),以及荷兰试验注册库(NL9138)。