Palm Rebecca, Sirsch Erika, Holle Bernhard, Bartholomeyczik Sabine
Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE) e.V., Standort Witten, Witten, Deutschland; Private Universität Witten/Herdecke, Fakultät für Gesundheit, Department Pflegewissenschaft, Witten, Deutschland.
Philosophisch-Theologische Hochschule Vallendar (PTHV), Fakultät für Pflegewissenschaft, Vallendar, Deutschland.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 May;122:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 16.
A large number of nursing home residents with cognitive impairments (CI) suffer from chronic pain, which is also discussed as a reason for challenging behavior. To assess pain in people with severe CI, the use of an observational pain instrument is recommended; for people without or with mild CI the gold standard is a self-rating instrument. It is unknown whether in German nursing homes pain assessment in residents with severe CI is actually conducted using observational instruments and which instruments are used. Because of different resident structure we assume that in dementia care units observational pain instruments are more often used than in integrated care units. The aim of this study was to investigate the conduction of pain assessments and the instruments used in both types of care units.
We conducted an observational study based on standardized data collection. A questionnaire was used to elicit whether pain assessment had been performed and what kind of instrument had been used last time. The cognitive status was also assessed. Based on these data, we determined for each resident whether a self- or proxy-rating instrument had been applied, considering his or her cognitive status. Afterwards, the resident data were aggregated on a care unit level. The use of single instruments was calculated in percentages. Differences between dementia care units and integrated care units were investigated with descriptive statistics and an independent t-test. A mixed-effects binary regression model was used to adjust for cluster effects.
The analysis sample consisted of n = 1,397 participating residents living in n = 75 care units (n = 30 dementia care units; n = 45 integrated care units). In the dementia care units, a mean of 82 % of residents with severe cognitive impairments was assessed using an observational proxy-rating assessment instrument; in the traditional integrated care units a percentage of 42 % was calculated. In the dementia care units, the median percentage of residents with severe cognitive impairments who were assessed with a self-rating instrument was below 10 %; in integrated care units it was 51 %. The differences were statistically significant. A mixed regression model confirmed the results. In the majority of dementia care units a single pain assessment tool was used for all residents; in 18 of 30 dementia care units this was a proxy-rated observational instrument.
The results indicate that pain assessment in cognitively impaired patients is suboptimal in many integrated care units because the nurses use inappropriate instruments. Also, they confirm the results of previous studies by demonstrating that instruments are used in clinical practice that are not recommended because their German-language versions are not validated. Since valid pain assessment is a prerequisite to appropriate pain treatment, we may assume that in many residents this is also not carried out as recommended.
Especially in integrated units, a defined and consented method of pain assessment is important because of the differences in their residents' cognitive and verbal abilities. Appropriate education may help to improve this process.
大量患有认知障碍(CI)的养老院居民饱受慢性疼痛之苦,慢性疼痛也被认为是引发攻击性行为的一个原因。为评估重度认知障碍患者的疼痛状况,建议使用观察性疼痛评估工具;对于无认知障碍或轻度认知障碍患者,金标准是自评工具。目前尚不清楚在德国养老院中,重度认知障碍患者的疼痛评估是否实际使用观察性工具,以及使用了哪些工具。由于居民结构不同,我们推测在失智症护理单元比在综合护理单元更常使用观察性疼痛评估工具。本研究旨在调查这两类护理单元中疼痛评估的实施情况及所使用的工具。
我们基于标准化数据收集开展了一项观察性研究。使用一份问卷来了解是否进行了疼痛评估以及上次使用的是何种工具。同时也评估了认知状况。基于这些数据,我们根据每位居民的认知状况确定是应用了自评工具还是代理评工具。之后,将居民数据汇总到护理单元层面。以百分比形式计算单一工具的使用情况。通过描述性统计和独立样本t检验研究失智症护理单元与综合护理单元之间的差异。使用混合效应二元回归模型来调整聚类效应。
分析样本包括居住在75个护理单元中的1397名参与研究的居民(30个失智症护理单元;45个综合护理单元)。在失智症护理单元,平均82%的重度认知障碍居民使用观察性代理评评估工具进行评估;在传统综合护理单元,这一比例为42%。在失智症护理单元,使用自评工具评估的重度认知障碍居民的中位数百分比低于10%;在综合护理单元则为51%。差异具有统计学意义。混合回归模型证实了该结果。在大多数失智症护理单元,所有居民都使用单一的疼痛评估工具;在30个失智症护理单元中的18个,这是一种代理评观察性工具。
结果表明,在许多综合护理单元中,认知障碍患者的疼痛评估并不理想,因为护士使用了不恰当的工具。此外,研究结果还证实了先前的研究结果,即临床实践中使用的工具不被推荐,因为其德语版本未经验证。由于有效的疼痛评估是适当疼痛治疗的前提,我们可以推测,许多居民的疼痛治疗也未按推荐进行。
尤其是在综合护理单元,鉴于其居民认知和语言能力的差异,确定并得到认可的疼痛评估方法很重要。适当的培训可能有助于改善这一过程。