Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
Aging Research Center (ARC), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS) Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Dec;35(4):1332-1341. doi: 10.1111/scs.12955. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Pain is common and often more complex to assess among nursing homes residents with cognitive impairments. Thus, more research is needed of different pain assessment methods in elderly care and how these assessments outcomes are related to quality of life, as there mostly should be a negative relationship. There is a risk that pain are under diagnosed among persons with cognitive impairment.
The aim was to describe and compare pain prevalence among nursing home residents (1) using different pain assessment methods (2) in relation to cognitive status and to (3) examine associations between pain and quality of life or well-being.
A cross-sectional correlational design was used, participants were 213 nursing home residents and data were collected through interviews using standardised protocols. Instrument used were Katz index of ADL, Mini-Mental-State-Examination, Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia scale, WHO-5 well-being index, Numeric Rating Scale and Doloplus-2 scale.
The results showed high pain prevalence, but no significant difference based on cognitive level. Pain classification at the individual level varied somewhat when different instruments are used. The results indicated that use of a single-item proxy-measure for pain tends to show higher pain prevalence and was not statistically significant related to quality of life. The relationship with quality of life was statistically significant when self-rated pain instruments or multi-component observation were used.
The study shows that it is difficult to estimate pain in residents living at nursing homes and that it continues to be a challenge to solve. Self-rated pain should be used primarily to assess pain, and a multi-component observation scale for pain should be used when residents are cognitively impaired. Both self-rated pain and multi-component observation also support the well-known link between pain and quality of life. Single-item proxy assessments should only be used in exceptional cases.
在认知障碍的养老院居民中,疼痛很常见,且通常更难以评估。因此,需要更多研究不同的老年护理疼痛评估方法,以及这些评估结果与生活质量的关系,因为两者之间应该存在负相关关系。认知障碍患者的疼痛可能存在诊断不足的风险。
本研究旨在描述和比较(1)使用不同疼痛评估方法和(2)认知状态与(3)疼痛与生活质量或幸福感之间的关系,来评估养老院居民的疼痛患病率。
本研究采用横断面相关性设计,参与者为 213 名养老院居民,通过使用标准化协议的访谈收集数据。使用的工具包括 Katz 日常生活活动指数、简易精神状态检查、晚期痴呆症生活质量量表、世界卫生组织-5 幸福感指数、数字评分量表和 Doloplus-2 量表。
结果显示疼痛患病率较高,但基于认知水平无显著差异。使用不同仪器进行疼痛分类时略有不同。结果表明,使用单一项目代理测量疼痛往往会显示更高的疼痛患病率,但与生活质量无统计学显著相关性。当使用自我报告的疼痛工具或多组件观察时,与生活质量的关系具有统计学意义。
本研究表明,评估养老院居民的疼痛难度较大,这仍然是一个亟待解决的挑战。应主要使用自我报告的疼痛来评估疼痛,当居民认知受损时,应使用多组件观察量表评估疼痛。自我报告的疼痛和多组件观察也支持疼痛与生活质量之间的已知关联。单一项目代理评估仅应在特殊情况下使用。