Suppr超能文献

探讨血液透析通路类型与死亡率之间的关联:通路并发症的作用。

Examining the Association between Hemodialysis Access Type and Mortality: The Role of Access Complications.

作者信息

Ravani Pietro, Quinn Robert, Oliver Matthew, Robinson Bruce, Pisoni Ronald, Pannu Neesh, MacRae Jennifer, Manns Braden, Hemmelgarn Brenda, James Matthew, Tonelli Marcello, Gillespie Brenda

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and.

Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):955-964. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12181116. Epub 2017 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

People receiving hemodialysis to treat kidney failure need a vascular access (a fistula, a graft, or a central venous catheter) to connect to the blood purification machine. Higher rates of access complications are considered the mechanism responsible for the excess mortality observed among catheter or graft users versus fistula users. We tested this hypothesis using mediation analysis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied incident patients who started hemodialysis therapy from North America, Europe, and Australasia (the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study; 1996-2011). We evaluated the association between access type and time to noninfectious (, thrombosis) and infectious complications of the access (mediator model) and the relationship between access type and time-dependent access complications with 6-month mortality from the creation of the first permanent access (outcome model). In mediation analysis, we formally tested whether access complications explain the association between access type and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 6119 adults that we studied (mean age =64 [SD=15] years old; 58% men; 47% patients with diabetes), 50% had a permanent catheter for vascular access, 37% had a fistula, and 13% had a graft. During the 6-month study follow-up, 2084 participants (34%) developed a noninfectious complication of the access, 542 (8.9%) developed an infectious complication, and 526 (8.6%) died. Access type predicted the occurrence of access complications; both access type and complications predicted mortality. The associations between access type and mortality were nearly identical in models excluding and including access complications (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 2.58 versus hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.56 to 2.59 for catheter versus fistula, respectively). In mediation analysis, higher mortality with catheters or grafts versus fistulas was not the result of increased rates of access complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodialysis access complications do not seem to explain the association between access type and mortality. Clinical trials are needed to clarify whether these associations are causal or reflect confounding by underlying disease severity.

摘要

背景与目的

接受血液透析治疗肾衰竭的患者需要血管通路(动静脉内瘘、移植物或中心静脉导管)来连接血液净化机器。血管通路并发症发生率较高被认为是导管或移植物使用者相较于动静脉内瘘使用者死亡率过高的原因。我们使用中介分析来检验这一假设。

设计、地点、参与者及测量方法:我们研究了来自北美、欧洲和澳大拉西亚开始血液透析治疗的新发病例患者(透析结果与实践模式研究;1996 - 2011年)。我们评估了血管通路类型与非感染性(如血栓形成)及血管通路感染性并发症发生时间之间的关联(中介模型),以及血管通路类型与自首次建立永久性血管通路起6个月死亡率的时间依赖性血管通路并发症之间的关系(结果模型)。在中介分析中,我们正式检验了血管通路并发症是否能解释血管通路类型与死亡率之间的关联。

结果

在我们研究的6119名成年人中(平均年龄 = 64 [标准差 = 15]岁;58%为男性;47%患有糖尿病),50%使用永久性导管作为血管通路,37%使用动静脉内瘘,13%使用移植物。在6个月的研究随访期间,2084名参与者(34%)出现了血管通路的非感染性并发症,542名(8.9%)出现了感染性并发症,526名(8.6%)死亡。血管通路类型可预测血管通路并发症的发生;血管通路类型和并发症均能预测死亡率。在排除和纳入血管通路并发症的模型中,血管通路类型与死亡率之间的关联几乎相同(导管与动静脉内瘘相比,风险比分别为2.00;95%置信区间为1.55至2.58,以及风险比为2.01;95%置信区间为1.56至2.59)。在中介分析中,导管或移植物使用者相较于动静脉内瘘使用者死亡率较高并非血管通路并发症发生率增加的结果。

结论

血液透析血管通路并发症似乎无法解释血管通路类型与死亡率之间的关联。需要进行临床试验以明确这些关联是因果关系还是反映了潜在疾病严重程度的混杂因素。

相似文献

7
Patient-centric analysis of dialysis access outcomes.以患者为中心的透析通路结局分析。
J Vasc Access. 2010 Jan-Mar;11(1):31-7. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100107.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验