Suppr超能文献

体素内不相干运动在肺癌纵隔淋巴结转移术前评估中的初步探索。

A preliminary exploration of the intravoxel incoherent motion applied in the preoperative evaluation of mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer.

作者信息

Ye Xin, Chen Shuo, Tian Yaru, You Bin, Zhang Wenqian, Zhao Yan, Jiang Tao, Hu Bin, Li Hui

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Apr;9(4):1073-1080. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.110.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for distinguishing non-metastatic from metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer.

METHODS

IVIM-diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) exams were performed preoperatively on 66 patients with lung cancer from October 2015 to June 2016 in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University. Fifty patients underwent enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) in our hospital, while the other 16 patients already had enhanced chest CT images when they were admitted. The patients' complete preoperative examination included chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), enhanced chest CT, head MRI, bone scanning and cardiopulmonary function testing. None of the patients were receiving any treatment for their cancer prior to their evaluation and surgery, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy or gene targeted therapy. The following IVIM parameters of the mediastinal lymph nodes were measured: the short axis diameter, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f). All of the patients underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection. We compared the CT and MRI results and analysed the IVIM parameters of the pathologically determined non-metastatic and metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in our 50 patients to generate the ROC curves and determine the best cut-off value for diagnosis. The remaining 16 patients' IVIM parameters were used to verify the diagnostic cut-off value. This study was approved by the institutional research ethics committee of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital (2014-S-166), and all the patients signed the MRI informed consent.

RESULTS

In this study, MRI was used to measure 140 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes in 50 cases, and the results showed that 19 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were metastatic, while 121 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were non-metastatic. The pathological analysis showed that 20 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were metastatic and 120 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were non-metastatic. CT was used to measure 273 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes, and the result showed that 34 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were metastatic, while 239 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were non-metastatic. The pathological analysis showed that 20 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were metastatic and 253 groups of mediastinal lymph nodes were non-metastatic. The ADC, D, D*, f values and the short axis diameters of the non-metastatic lymph nodes (n=121) were 2.9370±0.743×10, 0.533±0.175×10, 0.384±0.121×10 mm/s, 0.426±0.120, 6.903±1.831 mm, respectively, and 1.863±0.691×10, 0.454±0.204×10, 0.358±0.106×10 mm/s, 0.413±0.085, 7.705±2.213 mm, respectively, for the metastatic lymph nodes (n=19). The ADC and D values of the non-metastatic lymph nodes were significantly higher than the values for the metastatic lymph nodes (P<0.01); the other parameters (D*, f, and short axis diameter) did not show significantly different results between the two groups. The optimal cut-off values [area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity] for distinguishing metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes were as follows: ADC =1.890×10 mm/s (0.897, 93.3%, 80.0%), Youden index 0.733; and D =0.344×10 mm/s (0.651, 90.8%, 50.0%), Youden index 0.651. When these cut-off values were applied as the diagnostic criteria in the remaining cases and compared with the pathology results, the diagnostic performance was good.

CONCLUSIONS

IVIM is useful to distinguish metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in lung cancer. The ADC and the D values are significantly lower in metastatic lymph nodes, making these parameters more sensitive than the other parameters (D*, f, and short axis diameter). As a result, IVIM can be used in the N-stage diagnosis of lung cancer.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨体素内不相干运动(IVIM)在区分肺癌非转移性与转移性纵隔淋巴结方面的诊断价值。

方法

2015年10月至2016年6月期间,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院对66例肺癌患者进行了术前IVIM扩散加权成像(DWI)检查。其中50例患者在我院接受了增强胸部计算机断层扫描(CT),另外16例患者入院时已有增强胸部CT图像。患者的术前完整检查包括胸部磁共振成像(MRI)、增强胸部CT、头部MRI、骨扫描和心肺功能测试。在评估和手术前,所有患者均未接受任何针对癌症的治疗,包括新辅助化疗、放疗、免疫治疗或基因靶向治疗。测量纵隔淋巴结的以下IVIM参数:短轴直径、表观扩散系数(ADC)、扩散系数(D)、伪扩散系数(D*)和灌注分数(f)。所有患者均接受肺叶切除术和淋巴结清扫术。我们比较了CT和MRI结果,并分析了50例患者中经病理确定的非转移性和转移性纵隔淋巴结的IVIM参数,以生成ROC曲线并确定最佳诊断临界值。其余16例患者的IVIM参数用于验证诊断临界值。本研究经北京朝阳医院机构研究伦理委员会批准(2014-S-166),所有患者均签署了MRI知情同意书。

结果

本研究中,MRI测量了50例患者的140组纵隔淋巴结,结果显示19组纵隔淋巴结为转移性,121组纵隔淋巴结为非转移性。病理分析显示20组纵隔淋巴结为转移性,120组纵隔淋巴结为非转移性。CT测量了273组纵隔淋巴结,结果显示34组纵隔淋巴结为转移性,239组纵隔淋巴结为非转移性。病理分析显示20组纵隔淋巴结为转移性,253组纵隔淋巴结为非转移性。非转移性淋巴结(n = 121)的ADC、D、D*、f值和短轴直径分别为2.9370±0.743×10、0.533±0.175×10、0.384±0.121×10 mm/s、0.426±0.120、6.903±1.831 mm,转移性淋巴结(n = 19)的相应值分别为1.863±0.691×10、0.454±0.204×10、0.358±0.106×10 mm/s、0.413±0.085、7.705±2.213 mm。非转移性淋巴结的ADC和D值显著高于转移性淋巴结(P < 0.01);两组间其他参数(D*、f和短轴直径)差异无统计学意义。区分转移性与非转移性淋巴结的最佳临界值[曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性和特异性]如下:ADC = 1.890×10 mm/s(0.897,93.3%,80.0%),约登指数0.733;D = 0.344×10 mm/s(0.651,90.8%,50.0%),约登指数0.651。当将这些临界值作为诊断标准应用于其余病例并与病理结果比较时,诊断性能良好。

结论

IVIM有助于区分肺癌的转移性与非转移性淋巴结。转移性淋巴结的ADC和D值显著降低,使这些参数比其他参数(D*、f和短轴直径)更敏感。因此,IVIM可用于肺癌的N分期诊断。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Global cancer statistics, 2012.全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验