• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响前交叉韧带动态关节内稳定术翻修风险的患者和手术特点。

Patient and surgical characteristics that affect revision risk in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament.

机构信息

Department of Knee Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Sonnenhof Orthopaedic Center, Bern, Switzerland.

Swiss RDL, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4574-y. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-017-4574-y
PMID:28523340
Abstract

PURPOSE

Failure of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) that requires revision surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of revision ACL surgery, and the patient characteristics and surgery-related factors that are associated with an increased risk of ACL revision after DIS.

METHODS

This study analysed a prospective, consecutively documented single-centre case series using standardized case report forms over a 2.5-year follow-up period. The primary endpoint was revision ACL surgery. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to examine the revision-free survival time, and a multiple logistic regression model of potential risk factors including age, sex, BMI, smoking status, previous contralateral ACL injury, Tegner activity score, interval to surgery, rupture pattern, hardware removal, and postoperative side-to-side difference in knee laxity. Relative risk was calculated for subgroups of significant risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 381 patients (195 male) with a mean age of 33 ± 12 years were included in the analysis. The incidence of revision ACL surgery was 30/381 (7.9%). Younger age (p = 0.001), higher Tegner activity score (p = 0.003), and increased knee laxity (p = 0.015) were significantly associated with revision ACL surgery. The increased relative risk for patients who were less than 24 years old, participated in activities at a Tegner level >5 points, or had >2 mm of side-to-side difference in knee laxity was 1.6, 3.7, and 2.3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Young age, high level of sport activity, and high knee laxity observed in follow-up examinations increased the likelihood for revision surgery after DIS. Patients undergoing DIS should be informed of their potentially increased risk for therapy failure and carefully monitored during recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

摘要

目的

动态关节内稳定(DIS)失效需要进行前交叉韧带(ACL)修复手术,但目前尚未对此进行研究。本研究旨在调查 ACL 修复手术后的复发率,并探讨与 DIS 后 ACL 修复风险增加相关的患者特征和手术相关因素。

方法

本研究通过前瞻性、连续记录的单中心病例系列研究,在 2.5 年的随访期间使用标准化病例报告表进行分析。主要终点是 ACL 修复手术。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析来检查无复发性生存时间,并使用多元逻辑回归模型分析包括年龄、性别、BMI、吸烟状况、对侧 ACL 损伤史、Tegner 活动评分、手术间隔时间、撕裂模式、内固定去除以及术后膝关节松弛的侧-侧差值等潜在危险因素。对于具有显著危险因素的亚组,计算相对风险。

结果

共纳入 381 例患者(195 例男性),平均年龄为 33 ± 12 岁。ACL 修复手术的发生率为 30/381(7.9%)。年龄较小(p=0.001)、Tegner 活动评分较高(p=0.003)和膝关节松弛度增加(p=0.015)与 ACL 修复手术显著相关。年龄小于 24 岁、Tegner 活动评分大于 5 分或膝关节松弛度侧-侧差值大于 2mm 的患者,其发生 ACL 修复手术的相对风险分别为 1.6、3.7 和 2.3。

结论

随访检查中发现的年轻、高运动水平和高膝关节松弛度增加了 DIS 后手术修复的可能性。接受 DIS 治疗的患者应被告知其潜在的治疗失败风险增加,并在康复期间进行仔细监测。

证据等级

病例系列研究,IV 级。

相似文献

1
Patient and surgical characteristics that affect revision risk in dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament.影响前交叉韧带动态关节内稳定术翻修风险的患者和手术特点。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Apr;26(4):1182-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4574-y. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of anterior cruciate ligament repair: hardware removal has no effect on knee laxity at 2-year follow-up.前交叉韧带修复术中动态韧带内稳定术:在2年随访时取出内固定物对膝关节松弛度无影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 May;139(5):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03113-x. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Versus Primary Reconstruction of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Study.动态关节内稳定与急性前交叉韧带撕裂的初次重建修复:一项前瞻性随机研究的 2 年结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1108-1116. doi: 10.1177/0363546520905863. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.动态内置式韧带稳定或 ACL 重建后 ACL 修复的膝关节关节松弛度和患者报告的结果相当:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3256-3264. doi: 10.1177/03635465221117777. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
5
ACL suturing using dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation showing good clinical outcome but a high reoperation rate: a retrospective independent study.采用动态关节内稳定技术缝合 ACL 显示出良好的临床效果,但返修率较高:一项回顾性独立研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Feb;26(2):655-659. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4726-0. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure.外科医生在动态关节内稳定术中的经验不会影响失败风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Oct;26(10):2978-2985. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4847-0. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization.胶原蛋白的应用降低了采用动态韧带内稳定技术治疗的 ACL 中间段撕裂的并发症发生率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2414-2419. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3838-7. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
High complication rate following dynamic intraligamentary stabilization for primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.前交叉韧带初次修复中采用动态关节内韧带稳定术,其并发症发生率高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):29-36. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5067-3. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
9
Seventy percent long-term survival of the repaired ACL after dynamic intraligamentary stabilization.ACL 经动态韧带内稳定修复后 70%长期生存。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):594-598. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05749-z. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.翻修前交叉韧带重建术后临床结果的手术预测因素
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2586-2594. doi: 10.1177/0363546517712952. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Age and Activity Level, Posterior Tibial Slope, and Use of Allograft Are Significant Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review.患者年龄与活动水平、胫骨后倾以及同种异体移植物的使用是前交叉韧带重建失败的重要危险因素:一项系统评价。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 15;7(2):101075. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101075. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Successful ACL repair by dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation is non-inferior in functional performance and worse in proprioception compared to healthy controls in a case-matched study.在一项病例匹配研究中,与健康对照组相比,通过动态韧带内稳定术成功修复前交叉韧带在功能表现上不逊色,但本体感觉较差。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 26;11(4):e70047. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70047. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the High Reinjury Rate in Younger Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.探索接受前交叉韧带重建的年轻患者的高再损伤率。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2827-2832. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651845. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
2
Outcomes and Risk Factors of Rerevision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带翻修重建的结果与危险因素:一项系统评价
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):2151-2159. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Dynamic intraligamentary stabilisation: initial experience with treatment of acute ACL ruptures.
Four-year comparative analysis of return to sport and psychological recovery following ACL revision: Artificial ligament vs. anterior tibial tendon allograft.前交叉韧带翻修术后恢复运动及心理康复的四年对比分析:人工韧带与胫骨前肌腱同种异体移植的比较
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Jun 18;47:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Early Complication Analysis of Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization versus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.动态韧带内稳定术与前交叉韧带重建术的早期并发症分析
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 21;13(7):1022. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071022.
5
Graft failure and revision rate after ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. One-year results of a prospective case series of 155 patients.前交叉韧带修复术中采用动态韧带内稳定技术后的移植物失败率和翻修率。155例患者前瞻性病例系列的1年结果。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 May 5;10(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00614-y.
6
Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair: Response.前交叉韧带修复术后膝关节仪器测量的类似松弛度及患者报告的结果:回应
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(3):NP12-NP14. doi: 10.1177/03635465221144035.
7
Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.动态内置式韧带稳定或 ACL 重建后 ACL 修复的膝关节关节松弛度和患者报告的结果相当:一项随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3256-3264. doi: 10.1177/03635465221117777. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
8
Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction.重返运动:一项高风险的选择?一项基于 ACL 重建后移植物破裂风险因素的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):91-110. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01747-3. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
9
Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization provides a similarly successful outcome as all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a faster psychological recovery in moderately active patients.采用动态韧带内稳定技术修复前交叉韧带,在中度活跃的患者中,其心理恢复更快,与全内前交叉韧带重建的成功率相当。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(2):406-413. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.631. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
10
Occurrence of inadequate ACL healing after Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization and functional outcome-a multicentre case series.动态关节内稳定化后 ACL 愈合不足的发生和功能结果:一项多中心病例系列研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Oct;32(7):1265-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03096-9. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
动态韧带内稳定术:急性前交叉韧带断裂治疗的初步经验
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):793-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.35040.
4
Functional recovery following primary ACL repair with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization.采用动态韧带内稳定技术进行初次前交叉韧带修复后的功能恢复。
Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):549-53. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results.翻修 ACL 重建与初次手术相比如何?一项比较患者报告和临床医生报告的结果以及影像学结果的荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;50(12):716-24. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094948. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
Collagen application reduces complication rates of mid-substance ACL tears treated with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization.胶原蛋白的应用降低了采用动态韧带内稳定技术治疗的 ACL 中间段撕裂的并发症发生率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2414-2419. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3838-7. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Traumatic graft rupture after primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of incidence and risk factors in 2915 cases.初次及翻修前交叉韧带重建术后创伤性移植物破裂:2915例病例的发生率及危险因素回顾性分析
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1535-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3699-0. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.前交叉韧带重建翻修术:临床结果及恢复运动的证据
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct;23(10):2825-45. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3702-9. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
9
Revision Risk After Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Association With Graft Processing Techniques, Patient Characteristics, and Graft Type.同种异体前交叉韧带重建术后的翻修风险:与移植物处理技术、患者特征及移植物类型的关联
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2696-705. doi: 10.1177/0363546515589168. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
Comparison of Graft Failure Rate Between Autografts Placed via an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression.通过解剖学前交叉韧带重建技术植入的自体移植物之间的移植失败率比较:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1069-79. doi: 10.1177/0363546515584043. Epub 2015 May 21.