Suppr超能文献

采用动态韧带内稳定技术修复前交叉韧带,在中度活跃的患者中,其心理恢复更快,与全内前交叉韧带重建的成功率相当。

Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization provides a similarly successful outcome as all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a faster psychological recovery in moderately active patients.

机构信息

İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 34537 Tepekent, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(2):406-413. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.631. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to comparatively evaluate early to mid-term clinical results of case-matched patient groups of primary repairs with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) or all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) by an independent group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2015 and September 2018, a total of 16 patients operated for ACL injuries with the repair technique were retrospectively identified. Cases were stratified by treatment: DIS technique versus all-inside ACLR and matched at a ratio of 1:2. The ACLR patients were selected from a patient group with an injury-to-operation time interval of fewer than three months. A total of 32 patients were included in the all inside ACLR group. Pre-injury and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Tegner and Lysholm scores had been obtained. Additionally, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale scores, clinical results, and complications were noted.

RESULTS

One (6%) patient in the DIS group and two (6%) patients in the ACLR group were lost-to-follow-up and, for a total of 45 patients, 15 in the DIS group and 30 in the ACLR group, were included in the study. The mean postoperative follow-up was 50.8±13.5 months and 48.2±11.4 months in the DIS and ACLR groups, respectively. The Tegner, Lysholm, and IKDC subjective scores were non-significantly different between the groups at any time points. The ACL-RSI scale scores were significantly higher at six (p<0.001) and 12 (p=0.01) months in the repair group. The pivot-shift test was negative in all cases postoperatively. One re-rupture occurred in each group. The reoperation rate at any cause was 25% for the repair and 10% for the ACLR group.

CONCLUSION

Primary ACL repair using the DIS technique provides a similar clinical outcome to these by an all-inside ACLR technique in moderately active patients. The DIS technique is reliable and reproducible, and associated with an early and speedier psychological recovery in a carefully selected, non-athlete patient group as observed by an independent group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过独立小组比较分析采用动态关节内韧带稳定术(DIS)或全内前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术(ACLR)进行初次修复的患者的中期临床结果。

患者和方法

2015 年 3 月至 2018 年 9 月,回顾性地确定了 16 例接受 ACL 损伤修复技术治疗的患者。根据治疗方法将病例分层:DIS 技术与全内 ACLR,并以 1:2 的比例匹配。ACLR 患者选自受伤至手术时间间隔少于 3 个月的患者组。共纳入 32 例全内 ACLR 患者。记录了术前和术后国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分、Tegner 和 Lysholm 评分。此外,还记录了 ACL 损伤后重返运动(ACL-RSI)量表评分、临床结果和并发症。

结果

DIS 组中有 1 例(6%)患者和 ACLR 组中有 2 例(6%)患者失访,共有 45 例患者,其中 DIS 组 15 例,ACLR 组 30 例,纳入研究。DIS 组和 ACLR 组的平均术后随访时间分别为 50.8±13.5 个月和 48.2±11.4 个月。在任何时间点,Tegner、Lysholm 和 IKDC 主观评分在两组之间均无显著差异。在修复组中,6 个月(p<0.001)和 12 个月(p=0.01)时 ACL-RSI 量表评分显著更高。术后所有病例的髌股关节试验均为阴性。两组各发生 1 例再断裂。任何原因的再手术率在修复组为 25%,在 ACLR 组为 10%。

结论

在中度活跃的患者中,采用 DIS 技术进行 ACL 初次修复可获得与全内 ACLR 技术相似的临床结果。在一个经过精心挑选的非运动员患者群体中,DIS 技术是可靠且可重复的,并且与早期和更快的心理康复相关,这是由一个独立小组观察到的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f40/9361114/d0309a256b99/JDRS-2022-33-2-406-413-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验