• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期医学中的结构化患者交接:临床实践中的原理与实施

[Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].

作者信息

Merkel M J, von Dossow V, Zwißler B

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2017 Jun;66(6):396-403. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0320-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-017-0320-6
PMID:28523364
Abstract

Clear and consistent communication is pivotal for well-functioning teamwork, in operating theatres as well as intensive care units. However, patient handovers significantly vary between specialties and locations. If communication is not well structured, it might increase the risk for mishaps and malpractice. Therefore, implementing structured handover protocols is pivotal. The perioperative setting is a high-risk environment that is prone to communication failures due to operational design (frequent change of shift due to working time restrictions) and a high work load and multitasking (operating room management, short surgery times, concurrent emergencies). Hence teamwork in the operating room and intensive care unit requires clear and consistent communication. In the perioperative setting, the patient is transferred several times: from the ward to operating room, to recovery, intermediate care/intensive care unit and back to normal ward. This necessitates multiple handovers. Since 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) requests a structured handover concept that processes all relevant information in a predefined order. The SBAR concept (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) is an intuitive communication concept that can improve quality of patient handovers. This underlines the clinical relevance of a structured handover concept that leads to improved outcomes for every patient.In this review, basic measures for a clear and consistent communication are presented. These are pivotal for an effective teamwork and for ensuing patient safety. Furthermore, we will focus on possibilities to implement structured approaches but also on potential barriers of implementation. Communication failure among different health care providers can be identified more easily and hopefully can be eliminated.

摘要

清晰且一致的沟通对于手术室和重症监护病房中高效运作的团队合作至关重要。然而,患者交接在不同专科和地点之间存在显著差异。如果沟通结构不完善,可能会增加发生事故和医疗失误的风险。因此,实施结构化交接协议至关重要。围手术期环境是一个高风险环境,由于运营设计(因工作时间限制导致班次频繁更换)以及高工作量和多任务处理(手术室管理、手术时间短、并发紧急情况),容易出现沟通失误。因此,手术室和重症监护病房的团队合作需要清晰且一致的沟通。在围手术期,患者会被多次转移:从病房到手术室,再到恢复室、中间护理/重症监护病房,最后回到普通病房。这就需要进行多次交接。自2005年以来,世界卫生组织(WHO)要求采用一种结构化交接概念,按照预定义的顺序处理所有相关信息。SBAR概念(情况、背景、评估、建议)是一种直观的沟通概念,可以提高患者交接的质量。这凸显了结构化交接概念的临床相关性,它能为每个患者带来更好的治疗结果。在本综述中,介绍了实现清晰且一致沟通的基本措施。这些对于有效的团队合作和确保患者安全至关重要。此外,我们将关注实施结构化方法的可能性以及实施过程中的潜在障碍。不同医疗服务提供者之间的沟通失误能够更容易被识别,有望得以消除。

相似文献

1
[Structured patient handovers in perioperative medicine : Rationale and implementation in clinical practice].围手术期医学中的结构化患者交接:临床实践中的原理与实施
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jun;66(6):396-403. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0320-6.
2
Recommendations of the German Association of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) on structured patient handover in the perioperative setting : The SBAR concept.德国麻醉学与重症医学协会(DGAI)关于围手术期结构化患者交接的建议:SBAR概念
Anaesthesist. 2016 Dec;65(Suppl 1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0237-5.
3
[Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine on structured patient handover in the perioperative phase : SBAR concept].[德国麻醉与重症医学学会关于围手术期结构化患者交接的建议:SBAR概念]
Anaesthesist. 2016 Feb;65(2):148-50. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0126-3.
4
Sustainability of protocolized handover of pediatric cardiac surgery patients to the intensive care unit.小儿心脏手术患者向重症监护病房进行标准化交接的可持续性。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 May;26(5):488-94. doi: 10.1111/pan.12878. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.儿科术后患者交接过程中的团队表现。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;179(4):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
Teamwork and mental workload in postsurgical pediatric patient handovers: Prospective effect evaluation of an improvement intervention for OR-PICU patient transitions.术后儿科患者交接中的团队合作和精神工作负荷:手术室-儿科重症监护病房患者交接改进干预的前瞻性效果评估。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5637-5647. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05241-4. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
7
The perioperative handoff protocol: evaluating impacts on handoff defects and provider satisfaction in adult perianesthesia care units.围手术期交接协议:评估对成人麻醉后护理单元交接缺陷及医护人员满意度的影响
J Clin Anesth. 2015 Mar;27(2):111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
8
Team communication during patient handover from the operating room: more than facts and figures.手术室患者交接期间的团队沟通:不仅仅是事实和数据。
Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):138-56. doi: 10.1177/0018720812451594.
9
The impact of standardised perioperative handover protocols.标准化围手术期交接方案的影响
J Perioper Pract. 2018 Oct;28(10):258-262. doi: 10.1177/1750458918775555. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Handover from operating theatre to the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study.手术间向重症监护病房的交接:一项质量改进研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2019 May;32(3):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Telemedicine in medical education: An example of a digital preparatory course for the clinical traineeship - a pre-post comparison.远程医学在医学教育中的应用:以临床实习预备课程的数字化为例——一项前后对比研究。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc46. doi: 10.3205/zma001567. eCollection 2022.
2
Implementation of strategies to prevent and treat postoperative delirium in the post-anesthesia caring unit : A German survey of current practice.术后谵妄预防和治疗策略在麻醉后护理单元的实施:德国当前实践情况调查。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 May;35(3):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00516-9. Epub 2020 May 9.
3
[Multiprofessional management of delirium : A challenge-not only for intensivists].

本文引用的文献

1
A multidisciplinary initiative to standardize intensive care to acute care transitions.一项使重症监护到急性护理过渡标准化的多学科倡议。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Oct;28(5):615-625. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw076. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
2
[Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine on structured patient handover in the perioperative phase : SBAR concept].[德国麻醉与重症医学学会关于围手术期结构化患者交接的建议:SBAR概念]
Anaesthesist. 2016 Feb;65(2):148-50. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0126-3.
3
A Multimodal Intervention Improves Postanesthesia Care Unit Handovers.
[谵妄的多专业管理:一项挑战——不仅对重症监护医生而言]
Anaesthesist. 2018 Nov;67(11):809-810. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0503-9.
多模式干预可改善麻醉后护理单元的交接。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):957-971. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000670.
4
Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program.交接方案实施后医疗差错的变化。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1803-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.
5
SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anaesthetic clinic: a prospective intervention study.SBAR改善了麻醉诊所的沟通与安全氛围,并减少了因沟通错误导致的不良事件报告:一项前瞻性干预研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 21;4(1):e004268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004268.
6
Examining the feasibility and utility of an SBAR protocol in long-term care.探讨 SBAR 协议在长期护理中的可行性和实用性。
Geriatr Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 27.
7
SBAR improves nurse-physician communication and reduces unexpected death: a pre and post intervention study.SBAR 可改善护士与医师间的沟通并降低意外死亡率:一项干预前后研究。
Resuscitation. 2013 Sep;84(9):1192-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Telephone referrals by junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of SBAR in a simulated setting.初级医生的电话转诊:一项在模拟环境中评估 SBAR 影响的随机对照试验。
Postgrad Med J. 2012 Nov;88(1045):619-26. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130719. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Implementing SBAR across a large multihospital health system.在一个大型多医院医疗系统中实施SBAR。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jun;38(6):261-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38033-1.
10
What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.医院临床人员不遵守规程的原因是什么?对澳大利亚多校区大都市医疗服务机构床边临床人员未能启动快速反应系统的事件发生率及背后因素进行分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):569-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692. Epub 2012 May 23.