1 Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
2 Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;52(1):68-77. doi: 10.1177/0004867417708610. Epub 2017 May 19.
While diagnostically independent, autism and schizotypal disorders can co-occur. Their concurrent impact on outcomes and phenotypes has not been investigated. We investigated the impact of comorbid autism and schizotypal disorders in children on executive functioning and socio-pragmatic skills - core features of both disorders.
Executive functioning (assessed with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) and socio-pragmatic skills (assessed using the Melbourne Assessment of Schizotypy in Kids) were investigated in a total of 67 (6-12 year old) children with autism ( n = 15; M/F = 10/5), schizotypal disorder ( n = 8; M/F = 5/3) and comorbid autism and schizotypal disorder ( n = 12; M/F = 5/7) and typically developing children ( n = 32; M/F = 17/15).
Both the autism and schizotypal disorder groups performed more poorly than the typically developing group on socio-pragmatic skills and overall performance (i.e. number of stages completed) of the intra-/extra-dimensional set-shifting task (all ps < 0.001). Clear distinctions between the autism and schizotypal groups were present in the intra-/extra-dimensional task relative to the typically developing group - the autism group had difficulties with extra-dimensional shifts ( p < 0.001), and the schizotypal disorder group with intra-dimensional shifts ( p = 0.08). Interestingly, the overall performance of the comorbid group on the intra-/extra-dimensional task was not significantly different from the typically developing group, and they were superior to both the autism ( p = 0.019) and schizotypal disorder ( p = 0.042) groups on socio-pragmatic skills.
The phenotypical overlap between autism and schizotypal disorders may be precipitated by different cognitive styles and/or mechanisms associated with attention and information processing. We propose that sustaining and switching attention represent two poles of irregularities across the autism and schizotypal spectra, which appear to converge in a compensatory manner in the comorbid group. Our findings highlight the importance of investigating children with a dual diagnosis of autism and schizotypal disorders, and raise intriguing questions about possible mechanisms to explain the attenuated impairment observed in the group of children with comorbid autism and schizotpyal disorders.
自闭症和分裂型人格障碍在诊断上是独立的,但它们可能同时存在。它们对结果和表型的并发影响尚未得到研究。我们调查了儿童自闭症和分裂型人格障碍共病对执行功能和社交语用技能的影响,这两种障碍的核心特征。
我们总共研究了 67 名(6-12 岁)自闭症儿童(n=15;男/女=10/5)、分裂型人格障碍儿童(n=8;男/女=5/3)和自闭症与分裂型人格障碍共病儿童(n=12;男/女=5/7)以及正常发育儿童(n=32;男/女=17/15)的执行功能(使用剑桥神经心理学测试自动电池进行评估)和社交语用技能(使用墨尔本儿童分裂型特质评估进行评估)。
自闭症和分裂型人格障碍组在社交语用技能和内外维度转换任务的整体表现(即完成的阶段数)上均明显差于正常发育组(所有 p 值均<0.001)。自闭症和分裂型人格障碍组与正常发育组相比,在内外维度任务中表现出明显的差异,自闭症组在多维转换中存在困难(p<0.001),分裂型人格障碍组在一维转换中存在困难(p=0.08)。有趣的是,共病组在内外维度任务中的整体表现与正常发育组无显著差异,且在社交语用技能方面优于自闭症组(p=0.019)和分裂型人格障碍组(p=0.042)。
自闭症和分裂型人格障碍的表型重叠可能是由注意力和信息处理相关的不同认知方式和/或机制引起的。我们提出,维持和转换注意力代表了自闭症和分裂型人格障碍谱系中不规则性的两个极端,在共病组中似乎以补偿的方式汇聚。我们的研究结果强调了研究自闭症和分裂型人格障碍双重诊断儿童的重要性,并提出了关于可能的机制的有趣问题,以解释共病组观察到的损伤减轻。