• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗糖尿病治疗患者的有效性与临床惰性

Effectiveness and clinical inertia in patients with antidiabetic therapy.

作者信息

Machado-Duque Manuel Enrique, Ramírez-Riveros Adriana Carolina, Machado-Alba Jorge Enrique

机构信息

Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Colombia.

Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina, S.E.S. Hospital de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;71(6). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12954. Epub 2017 May 19.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.12954
PMID:28524340
Abstract

AIMS

To establish the effectiveness of antidiabetic therapy and the frequency of clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Colombia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study with follow-up of patients who had been treated for at least 1 year and were receiving medical consultation for antidiabetic treatment. Effectiveness was established when haemoglobin-A1c levels were <7% and when clinical inertia was reached, which was defined as no therapeutic modifications despite not achieving management controls. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were evaluated, and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 363 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were evaluated, with a mean age of 62.0±12.2 years. A total of 1,016 consultations were evaluated, and the therapy was effective at the end of the follow-up in 57.9% of cases. Clinical inertia was found in 56.8% of patients who did not have metabolic control. The most frequently prescribed medications were metformin (84.0%), glibenclamide (23.4%) and insulin glargine (20.7%). Moreover, 57.6% of the patients were treated with two or more antidiabetic medications. Having metabolic control in the first consult of the follow-up was a protective factor against clinical inertia in the subsequent consultations (OR: 0.08; 95%CI: 0.04-0.15; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has increased in Colombia, and for the first time, clinical inertia was identifiable and quantifiable and found in similar proportions to other countries. Clinical inertia is a relevant condition given that it interferes with the possibility of controlling this pathology.

摘要

目的

确定哥伦比亚2型糖尿病管理中抗糖尿病治疗的有效性及临床惰性的发生率。

方法

一项横断面研究,对接受治疗至少1年且正在接受抗糖尿病治疗医学咨询的患者进行随访。当糖化血红蛋白水平<7%时确定治疗有效,当达到临床惰性时(定义为尽管未实现管理目标但未进行治疗调整)确定存在临床惰性。评估社会人口统计学、临床和药理学变量,并进行多变量分析。

结果

共评估了363例2型糖尿病患者,平均年龄为62.0±12.2岁。共评估了1016次咨询,随访结束时治疗有效的病例占57.9%。在未达到代谢控制的患者中,56.8%存在临床惰性。最常处方的药物是二甲双胍(84.0%)、格列本脲(23.4%)和甘精胰岛素(20.7%)。此外,57.6%的患者接受了两种或更多种抗糖尿病药物治疗。随访首次咨询时达到代谢控制是后续咨询中防止临床惰性的保护因素(比值比:0.08;95%置信区间:0.04-0.15;P<0.001)。

结论

在哥伦比亚,2型糖尿病患者的治疗有效性有所提高,并且首次发现临床惰性是可识别和可量化的,其发生率与其他国家相似。鉴于临床惰性会干扰控制这种疾病的可能性,因此它是一个相关问题。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and clinical inertia in patients with antidiabetic therapy.抗糖尿病治疗患者的有效性与临床惰性
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;71(6). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12954. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Factors associated with clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with metformin monotherapy.与二甲双胍单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者临床惰性相关的因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2063-2070. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1648116. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
Combination therapy with insulin glargine plus metformin but not insulin glargine plus sulfonylurea provides similar glycemic control to triple oral combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with dual oral agent therapy.对于使用两种口服药物治疗血糖仍未得到控制的2型糖尿病患者,甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗而非甘精胰岛素联合磺脲类药物治疗能提供与三联口服联合治疗相似的血糖控制效果。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):1266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
4
Antidiabetic prescriptions and glycemic control in German patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective database study.德国2型糖尿病患者的抗糖尿病处方与血糖控制:一项回顾性数据库研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):316-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.012.
5
Clinical inertia in the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care.基层医疗中 2 型糖尿病患者高血糖治疗的临床惰性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Nov;29(11):1495-502. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.833089. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
6
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
7
Therapeutic inertia and intensified treatment in diabetes mellitus prescription patterns: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.糖尿病处方模式中的治疗惰性与强化治疗:一项基于台湾全国人口的研究。
J Int Med Res. 2016 Dec;44(6):1263-1271. doi: 10.1177/0300060516663095. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
Patient and Provider Factors Affecting Clinical Inertia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Monotherapy.影响接受二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者临床惰性的患者及医疗服务提供者因素
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1658-1670.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Greater reductions in A1C in type 2 diabetic patients new to therapy with glyburide/metformin tablets as compared to glyburide co-administered with metformin.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2003 Nov;5(6):424-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00297.x.
10
A comparison of twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 and once-daily insulin glargine in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral therapy: a randomized, open-label study.一项比较基础胰岛素联合口服药物治疗控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中每日两次预混胰岛素类似物(门冬胰岛素 70/30)和每日一次甘精胰岛素的随机、开放标签研究。
Endocr Pract. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):41-50. doi: 10.4158/EP10079.OR.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness, treatment, and control of diabetes in South America: A systematic review and meta-analysis.南美洲糖尿病的知晓、治疗与控制:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2025 May 5;69(2):e250026. doi: 10.20945/2359-4292-2025-0026.
2
Clinical inertia and treatment intensification among patients with type ii diabetes mellitus at Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia: an institutional-based cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚德布雷塔博尔综合专科医院2型糖尿病患者的临床惰性与治疗强化:一项基于机构的横断面研究
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 6;16:1450928. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1450928. eCollection 2025.
3
Noninsulin antidiabetic prescription patterns in Colombia: a cross-sectional study.
哥伦比亚非胰岛素类抗糖尿病药物处方模式:一项横断面研究。
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Oct 7;15:20420188241271806. doi: 10.1177/20420188241271806. eCollection 2024.
4
Clinical inertia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus among patients attending selected healthcare institutions in Colombia.哥伦比亚部分医疗机构中初诊2型糖尿病患者的临床惰性
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Feb 15;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01245-0.
5
Treatment patterns of antidiabetic and kidney protective therapies among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease in Colombia. The KDICO descriptive study.哥伦比亚2型糖尿病和慢性肾脏病患者的抗糖尿病及肾脏保护治疗模式。KDICO描述性研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Jul 4;15(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01126-6.
6
Clinical Inertia in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.临床惰性在 2 型糖尿病管理中的作用:系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 16;59(1):182. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010182.
7
Antibiotic Prescriptions for Respiratory Tract Viral Infections in the Colombian Population.哥伦比亚人群呼吸道病毒感染的抗生素处方
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jul 16;10(7):864. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070864.
8
Exploring early combination strategy in Latin American patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of the VERIFY study.探索拉丁美洲新诊断2型糖尿病患者的早期联合治疗策略:VERIFY研究的亚组分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2021 Jun 15;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13098-021-00686-9.
9
Availability of secondary healthcare data for conducting pharmacoepidemiology studies in Colombia: A systematic review.哥伦比亚开展药物流行病学研究的二级医疗保健数据的可用性:系统评价。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Oct;8(5):e00661. doi: 10.1002/prp2.661.
10
Prior Use of Medication for Primary Prevention in Patients with Coronary Syndrome.冠心病患者一级预防中的药物既往使用情况。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720946949. doi: 10.1177/2150132720946949.