Lee Subum, Seo Junghan, Lee Moon Kyu, Jeon Sang Ryong, Roh Sung Woo, Rhim Seung Chul, Park Jin Hoon
Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul; and.
Departments of 2 Neurology and.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Aug;27(2):150-157. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16738. Epub 2017 May 19.
OBJECTIVE The small diameter of cervical pedicles and a large transverse cervical pedicle angle are challenges that have led spinal surgeons to investigate how they could achieve a wider safety trajectory and reduce the insertion angle during cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement. In this paper, the authors detail the advantages of using a curved pedicle probe and a laterally located entry point for overcoming these challenges. METHODS From March 2012 to May 2016, the authors performed posterior cervical fusions using CPSs on 119 consecutive patients. The lateral mass screw conversion and the CPS breach rate were analyzed. Using preoperative CT, it was determined that θ is similar to the anatomical pedicle angle, and θ is the minimally acceptable medial angle. The actual insertion medial angle (θ) was determined by postoperative CT. To identify how much of the medial angle on θ could be reduced from the anatomical pedicle angle (θ), and how much closer to θ, (θ-θ) / (θ-θ) was calculated. To verify shifting of the entry point and widening of the trajectory, the mean df/Df (i.e., shifted facet point/planned facet point) values were analyzed. RESULTS The total number of planed CPSs was 759, the conversion rate was 4.61% (35/759), and the accuracy rate was 95.9% (694/724). The authors could calculate that θ could be expected near the 90%, 80%, 80%, 80%, and 110% value of θ on C-3, C-4, C-5, C-6, and C-7 levels, respectively, with the (θ-θ) / (θ-θ) equation. The mean df/Df values were 0.64, 0.62, 0.63, 0.63, and 1.24 on the C3-7 levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Through the use of a curved pedicle probe and a laterally located starting point, the planned and laterally located entry point medial shift was made during CPS placement. The entry point shift yielded a wider, safe trajectory and reduced the burden of making a large medial angle, similar to an anatomical cervical pedicle lateral angle, for safe CPS placement without creating a funnel-shaped hole.
目的 颈椎椎弓根直径小且颈椎椎弓根横向角度大,这些挑战促使脊柱外科医生研究如何在颈椎椎弓根螺钉(CPS)置入过程中获得更宽的安全轨迹并减小置入角度。在本文中,作者详细阐述了使用弯形椎弓根探子和外侧入点来克服这些挑战的优势。方法 2012年3月至2016年5月,作者对119例连续患者使用CPS进行了颈椎后路融合术。分析了侧块螺钉转换情况和CPS穿破率。利用术前CT确定θ与解剖学椎弓根角度相似,且θ为最小可接受内侧角度。实际置入内侧角度(θ)通过术后CT确定。为确定θ的内侧角度相较于解剖学椎弓根角度(θ)能减小多少,以及与θ接近多少,计算(θ - θ) / (θ - θ)。为验证入点的移位和轨迹的增宽,分析了平均df/Df(即移位的关节突点/计划的关节突点)值。结果 计划置入的CPS总数为759枚,转换率为4.61%(35/759),准确率为95.9%(694/724)。作者通过(θ - θ) / (θ - θ)公式计算得出,在C-3、C-4、C-5、C-6和C-7节段,θ分别可预期接近θ的90%、80%、80%、80%和110%值。C3 - 7节段的平均df/Df值分别为0.64、0.62、0.63、0.63和1.24。结论 通过使用弯形椎弓根探子和外侧起始点,在CPS置入过程中实现了计划的且位于外侧的入点内侧移位。入点移位产生了更宽的安全轨迹,并减轻了为安全置入CPS而形成大内侧角度(类似于解剖学颈椎椎弓根外侧角度)的负担,且不会形成漏斗形孔洞。