Departments of1Neuroradiology and.
2Neurosurgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):1250-1257. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161765. Epub 2017 May 19.
OBJECTIVE Frontal ventriculostomy is one of the most frequent and standardized procedures in neurosurgery. However, many first and subsequent punctures miss the target, and suboptimal placement or misplacement of the catheter is common. The authors therefore reexamined the landmarks and rules to determine the entry point and trajectory with the best hit rate (HtR). METHODS The authors randomly selected CT scans from their institution's DICOM pool that had been obtained in 50 patients with normal ventricular and skull anatomy and without ventricular puncture. Using a 5 × 5-cm frontal grid with 25 entry points referenced to the bregma, the authors examined trajectories 1) perpendicular to the skull, 2) toward classic facial landmarks in the coronal and sagittal planes, and 3) toward an idealized target in the middle of the ipsilateral anterior horn (ILAH). Three-dimensional virtual reality ventriculostomies were simulated for these entry points; trajectories and the HtRs were recorded, resulting in an investigation of 8000 different virtual procedures. RESULTS The best HtR for the ILAH was 86% for an ideal trajectory, 84% for a landmark trajectory, and 83% for a 90° trajectory, but only at specific entry points. The highest HtRs were found for entry points 3 or 4 cm lateral to the midline, but only in combination with a trajectory toward the contralateral canthus; and 1 or 2 cm lateral to the midline, but only paired with a trajectory toward the nasion. The same "pairing" exists for entry points and trajectories in the sagittal plane. For perpendicular (90°) trajectories, the best entry points were at 3-5 cm lateral to the midline and 3 cm anterior to the bregma, or 4 cm lateral to the midline and 2 cm anterior to the bregma. CONCLUSIONS Only a few entry points offer a chance of a greater than 80% rate of hitting the ILAH, and then only in combination with a specific trajectory. This "pairing" between entry point and trajectory was found both for landmark targeting and for perpendicular trajectories, with very limited variability. Surprisingly, the ipsilateral medial canthus, a commonly reported landmark, had low HtRs, and should not be recommended as a trajectory target.
目的
额角脑室造瘘术是神经外科中最常见和最标准化的程序之一。然而,许多初次和后续的穿刺都未能命中目标,导管的位置不当或错位很常见。因此,作者重新检查了确定最佳命中率(HtR)的入路点和轨迹的标志和规则。
方法
作者随机从他们机构的 DICOM 库中选择了 50 名具有正常脑室和颅骨解剖结构且未进行脑室穿刺的患者的 CT 扫描。使用带有 25 个入路点的 5×5cm 额部网格,参考额骨,作者检查了 1)垂直于颅骨的轨迹、2)冠状面和矢状面朝向经典面部标志的轨迹,以及 3)朝向同侧前角(ILAH)中间的理想目标的轨迹。对这些入路点进行了三维虚拟现实脑室造瘘术模拟;记录了轨迹和 HtR,从而对 8000 种不同的虚拟手术进行了调查。
结果
对于 ILAH,理想轨迹的最佳 HtR 为 86%,地标轨迹为 84%,90°轨迹为 83%,但仅在特定入路点有效。发现最佳 HtR 的入路点位于中线外侧 3 或 4cm,但仅与朝向对侧外角的轨迹结合使用;位于中线外侧 1 或 2cm,但仅与朝向鼻根的轨迹结合使用。矢状面的入路点和轨迹也存在相同的“配对”。对于垂直(90°)轨迹,最佳入路点位于中线外侧 3-5cm 且前颅点(bregma)前 3cm,或中线外侧 4cm 且前颅点前 2cm。
结论
只有少数入路点有超过 80%的机会命中 ILAH,而且只有在特定轨迹的情况下。这种入路点和轨迹之间的“配对”,无论是地标定位还是垂直轨迹,都有非常有限的变化。令人惊讶的是, ipsilateral medial canthus(同侧内眼角),一个常用的地标,HtR 较低,不应被推荐为轨迹目标。