Hayden F G, Innes D J, Mills S E, Levine P A
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville 22908.
Antiviral Res. 1988 Dec 1;10(4-5):225-34. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(88)90033-2.
In a double-blind trial 119 adults were randomly assigned to receive daily sprays of placebo (N = 30) or rIFN-alpha Con1 3 MU (N = 29), 9 MU (N = 30), or 30 MU (N = 30) per day for 25 consecutive days. Fifty-nine subjects were removed from treatment because of abnormal nasal exams (N = 56) or irritative symptoms (N = 3). The fraction of drop-outs in the placebo group (30%) was significantly different (P less than 0.05) from that in the 3 MU (55%), 9 MU (57%), or 30 MU (67%) groups. Nasal mucosal biopsies collected 1-2 days after completing spray use detected moderate or marked lymphocytic infiltration in 10% of placebo (N = 10), 90% of 3 MU (N = 9), 85% of 9 MU (N = 13), and 70% of 30 MU (N = 10) subjects (P less than 0.05, placebo vs each rIFN-alpha Con1 group). All 3 dose levels of rIFN-alpha Con1 were associated with significant clinical and histopathologic signs of nasal irritation. The findings suggest that intranasal rIFN-alpha Con1 does not have a more favorable therapeutic index than rIFN-alpha 2 and that the risk of nasal irritation relates more closely to the anti-viral activity than the protein content of the rIFN-alpha administered.
在一项双盲试验中,119名成年人被随机分配,连续25天每天接受安慰剂喷雾(N = 30)或重组干扰素α Con1,剂量分别为3 MU(N = 29)、9 MU(N = 30)或30 MU(N = 30)。59名受试者因鼻检查异常(N = 56)或刺激性症状(N = 3)而停止治疗。安慰剂组的退出率(30%)与3 MU组(55%)、9 MU组(57%)或30 MU组(67%)的退出率有显著差异(P < 0.05)。在完成喷雾使用后1 - 2天采集的鼻黏膜活检显示,安慰剂组10%(N = 10)、3 MU组90%(N = 9)、9 MU组85%(N = 13)和30 MU组70%(N = 10)的受试者有中度或明显的淋巴细胞浸润(P < 0.05,安慰剂组与各重组干扰素α Con1组相比)。重组干扰素α Con1的所有3个剂量水平均与鼻刺激的显著临床和组织病理学体征相关。研究结果表明,鼻内使用重组干扰素α Con1的治疗指数并不比重组干扰素α 2更有利,且鼻刺激的风险与所给予的重组干扰素α的抗病毒活性比蛋白质含量更密切相关。