Department of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Basel and Department of Biomedicine and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Sep 1;20(9):712-720. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx037.
Psychostimulants such as methylphenidate and modafinil are increasingly used by healthy people for cognitive enhancement purposes, whereas the acute effect of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) on cognitive functioning in healthy subjects remains unclear. This study directly compared the acute effects of methylphenidate, modafinil, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on the neural mechanisms underlying response inhibition in healthy subjects.
Using a double-blind, within-subject, placebo-controlled, cross-over design, methylphenidate, modafinil, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine were administrated to 21 healthy subjects while performing a go/no-go event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging task to assess brain activation during motor response inhibition.
Relative to placebo, methylphenidate and modafinil but not 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine improved inhibitory performance. Methylphenidate significantly increased activation in the right middle frontal gyrus, middle/superior temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, presupplementary motor area, and anterior cingulate cortex compared with placebo. Methylphenidate also induced significantly higher activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and presupplementary motor area and relative to modafinil. Relative to placebo, modafinil significantly increased activation in the right middle frontal gyrus and superior/inferior parietal lobule, while 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine significantly increased activation in the right middle/inferior frontal gyrus and superior parietal lobule.
Direct comparison of methylphenidate, modafinil, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine revealed broad recruitment of fronto-parietal regions but specific effects of methylphenidate on middle/superior temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and presupplementary motor area activation, suggesting dissociable modulations of response inhibition networks and potentially the superiority of methylphenidate in the enhancement of cognitive performance in healthy subjects.
哌醋甲酯和莫达非尼等精神兴奋剂越来越多地被健康人用于提高认知能力,而 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)对健康受试者认知功能的急性影响尚不清楚。本研究直接比较了哌醋甲酯、莫达非尼和 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺对健康受试者反应抑制神经机制的急性影响。
采用双盲、自身对照、交叉设计,在 21 名健康受试者进行 Go/No-Go 事件相关功能磁共振成像任务时,给予哌醋甲酯、莫达非尼和 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺,以评估运动反应抑制期间大脑激活情况。
与安慰剂相比,哌醋甲酯和莫达非尼而非 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺改善了抑制性能。与安慰剂相比,哌醋甲酯显著增加了右侧额中回、中/上颞回、下顶叶、预备运动区和前扣带皮层的激活。哌醋甲酯还诱导了前扣带皮层和预备运动区的激活,明显高于莫达非尼。与安慰剂相比,莫达非尼显著增加了右侧额中回和上/下顶叶的激活,而 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺显著增加了右侧额中/下回和上顶叶的激活。
哌醋甲酯、莫达非尼和 3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺的直接比较显示了广泛的额顶叶区域的招募,但哌醋甲酯对中/上颞回、前扣带皮层和预备运动区激活的特定影响,表明反应抑制网络的分离调节,以及哌醋甲酯在增强健康受试者认知表现方面的潜在优势。