Suppr超能文献

是什么影响了人们对睡眠质量的判断?一项针对睡眠良好者和睡眠不佳者的定量决策研究。

What Sways People's Judgment of Sleep Quality? A Quantitative Choice-Making Study With Good and Poor Sleepers.

作者信息

Ramlee Fatanah, Sanborn Adam N, Tang Nicole K Y

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Department of Psychology and Counselling, Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sleep. 2017 Jul 1;40(7). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx091.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis.

METHODS

One hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: "Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?". Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants' choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people's self-reported evaluation of sleep quality.

摘要

研究目的

我们将睡眠质量判断概念化为一个决策过程,并使用基于选择的联合分析来检验睡眠质量17个参数的相对重要性。

方法

100名参与者(50名睡眠良好者;50名睡眠不佳者)被要求在两个书面情景中进行选择,以回答两个问题中的一个:“哪一个描述了更好(或更差)的一晚睡眠?”。每个情景描述了一种自我报告的睡眠体验,将一天中不同时间(前一天、睡前、睡眠期间、醒来时、后一天)出现的17个可能的睡眠质量决定因素串联在一起。每位参与者回答48个问题。将逻辑回归模型拟合到他们的选择数据上。

结果

17个睡眠质量参数中的11个对参与者的选择有显著影响。睡眠质量的前三大决定因素是:总睡眠时间、醒来时感觉精力充沛以及后一天的情绪。睡眠质量判断受睡眠期间发生的因素影响最大,其次是醒来时以及后一天的感觉和活动。睡眠开始后醒来与醒来时感觉精力充沛之间以及醒来时感觉精力充沛与问题类型(更好或更差的一晚睡眠)之间存在显著交互作用。睡眠者类型(睡眠良好者与睡眠不佳者)对判断没有显著影响。

结论

睡眠质量判断似乎不仅取决于睡眠期间发生的事情,还取决于睡眠期之后发生的事情。改善白天情绪和功能的干预措施可能也会无意中提高人们对睡眠质量的自我报告评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/630d/5804994/1105581d3503/zsx09101.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验