Suppr超能文献

掌指关节固定在腕掌关节骨关节炎中的必要性:短期效果

Necessity of Immobilizing the Metacarpophalangeal Joint in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Short-term Effect.

作者信息

Cantero-Téllez Raquel, Valdes Kristin, Schwartz Deborah A, Medina-Porqueres Ivan, Arias Jean Christophe, Villafañe Jorge H

机构信息

1 Tecan Center Hand Clinic, Málaga, Spain.

2 University of Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2018 Jul;13(4):412-417. doi: 10.1177/1558944717708031. Epub 2017 May 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative treatment for carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) may include orthotic fabrication to decrease pain. Different types of orthoses have been used as conservative interventions to improve symptoms, but there are no guidelines specifying if inclusion of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) in an orthosis is required in the treatment of thumb CMC joint OA. The main objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of 2 different thumb CMC joint orthotic designs on pain reduction and improved hand function: one design immobilizes both the MCP joint and the CMC joint and the other design immobilizes only the CMC joint.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients were included in the study. One group of 33 patients received a short thumb orthosis with the MCP joint excluded, and the other group of 33 patients received a short thumb orthosis with the MCP joint included. Outcomes measures included the visual analog scale for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH; Spanish version) for function.

RESULTS

In both patient groups, the orthoses contributed to decreased pain levels and improved functional abilities ( F = 315.467 and F = 72.419; both, P < .001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding pain or improvement in daily activities ( F = 0.553 and F = 2.539; both, P > .05).

CONCLUSION

There are benefits of either thumb orthotic design on pain reduction and functional improvement even after 1 week of using the orthoses as the sole conservative treatment.

摘要

背景

腕掌关节(CMC)骨关节炎(OA)的保守治疗可能包括制作矫形器以减轻疼痛。不同类型的矫形器已被用作改善症状的保守干预措施,但尚无指南明确指出在治疗拇指CMC关节OA时矫形器是否需要纳入拇指掌指关节(MCP)。本研究的主要目的是确定两种不同的拇指CMC关节矫形器设计在减轻疼痛和改善手部功能方面的有效性:一种设计固定MCP关节和CMC关节,另一种设计仅固定CMC关节。

方法

共有66例患者纳入本研究。一组33例患者接受排除MCP关节的短拇指矫形器,另一组33例患者接受纳入MCP关节的短拇指矫形器。结果指标包括疼痛视觉模拟量表和用于评估功能的上肢、肩部和手部快速残疾评估量表(QuickDASH;西班牙语版)。

结果

在两组患者中,矫形器均有助于降低疼痛水平并改善功能能力(F = 315.467和F = 72.419;P均<0.001)。两组在疼痛或日常活动改善方面无显著差异(F = 0.553和F = 2.539;P均>0.05)。

结论

即使在将矫形器作为唯一保守治疗使用1周后,两种拇指矫形器设计在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面均有益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验